Princess Health and State Medicaid boss says program won't charge premiums but may have fewer benefits; Bevin's office says all is still on the table. Princessiccia

Princess Health and State Medicaid boss says program won't charge premiums but may have fewer benefits; Bevin's office says all is still on the table. Princessiccia

governor health insurance health reform Medicaid obamacare politics state budget state government

Gusty 19:05 Add Comment

The state's revised Medicaid program won't require any beneficiaries to pay premiums, but it may offer fewer benefits, Medicaid Commissioner Stephen Miller told Adam Beam of The Associated Press.

But Gov. Matt Bevin's office told Beam that Miller's comments were preliminary: "Everything is on the table and no decisions have been finalized," spokeswoman Jessica Ditto told him.

Bevin has said Medicaid recipients should have some "skin in the game" and has pointed to Indiana, which received a federal waiver allowing it to charge premiums based on income levels to people who want benefits beyond the basic Medicaid program.

The idea drew strong opposition from health-care providers, consumer advocates, public-health professionals and representatives of higher education in a May 12 meeting, according to the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky, which convened the gathering.

"Miller said negotiations with officials at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, a division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, indicate they will not approve a plan that requires Kentucky's expanded Medicaid population to pay for a portion of their health insurance," Beam reports.

Miller told him, "That, today, is not part of the plan. That is something that's going to be a tough sell."

Bevin is seeking changes that will save the state money. Starting Jan. 1, it will have to pay 5 percent of the costs of those who have joined Medicaid under the expanded eligibility created by the federal health-reform law. Its share will rise in annual steps to the law's limit of 10 percent in 2020. The state's expected bill for 2017 and the first half of 2018 is $257 million.

Now it seems that savings are likely to come by cutting benefits. "Miller said some Medicaid recipients could see fewer benefits under the new plan," Beam reports. "He said the health insurance plan for the state's Medicaid recipients is better than the basic plan offered to state employees. He said the new plan will likely bring the Medicaid plan more in line with the health plan offered to state workers." Miller said, "That would be a reduction in some benefit levels, such as in vision, dental."

Also, Miller said the program could encourage healthier behaviors by funding health savings accounts if they did such things as participating in smoking-cessation and weight-loss programs. "It may sound like we are rewarding them for that, but the long-term effect is it makes their health care coverage less expensive,"  Miller told Beam.

He said the state hopes to submit its waiver application in September. HHS spokesman Ben Wakana, told Beam that any changes "should maintain or build on the historic improvements Kentucky has seen in access to coverage, access to care, and financial security." Before the expansion; 20 percent of Kentuckians had no health coverage; now the figure is 7.5 percent.

Princess Health and Pediatricians' national group calls for at least one nurse in every school; Ky.'s schools have a long way to go to meet that goal. Princessiccia

Princess Health and Pediatricians' national group calls for at least one nurse in every school; Ky.'s schools have a long way to go to meet that goal. Princessiccia

children's health pediatrics school nurses state budget youth

Gusty 17:21 Add Comment

By Melissa Patrick
Kentucky Health News

Kentucky's high schools fall far short of new recommendations by the American Academy of Pediatrics that call for every school in the United States to have at least one nurse on site.

Only 42.2 percent of Kentucky's high schools have a full-time nurse, 37.4 percent have a part-time nurse and 20.4 percent do not have one at all, according to research led by Teena Darnell, assistant professor of nursing at Bellarmine University.

"School nurses improve school attendance and decrease the dropout rate which leads to better academic outcomes. . . . Most importantly, they help keep the nearly 680,000 children attending public school in Kentucky safe, healthy and ready to learn," Eva Stone and Mary Burch said in an e-mail to Kentucky Health News.

Stone, an advanced-practice registered nurse, is the director of student support services for Lincoln County Schools. Burch is the health coordinator for Erlanger-Elsmere Schools.

The pediatrics academy's policy statement, published in its journal Pediatrics, replaces a previous recommendation that districts have one nurse for every 750 healthy students, and one for every 225 students who need daily professional nursing assistance.

"The use of a ratio for workload determination in school nursing is inadequate to fill the increasingly complex health needs of students," says the policy statement.

School nurses today monitor more children with special needs, help with medical management in areas such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, diabetes, life-threatening allergies, asthma and seizures and also provide immunizations, work on obesity prevention efforts and provide substance abuse assessments, among other things, says the statement.

As school nurses have been eliminated from school budgets, school-based health centers, which provide health care to students through a public-private partnership, have become popular. This model allows schools to bill private insurance or Medicaid for services to offset some of the costs.

Most recently, the Carter County Board of Education unanimously approved a one-year contract with Kings Daughters Medical Center of Ashland to provide its school health services, Joe Lewis reports for the Grayson Journal Times. The hospital will provide a nurse practitioner who will rotate throughout the district's schools.

That doesn't comply with the new guidelines to have one nurse in every school, but the program plans to use telemedicine to keep the nurse practitioner connected to the schools throughout the day.

"Unfortunately, Kentucky has no requirement to have a registered nurse in every school," Stone and Burch write. "Every school needs a nurse. What we see in the schools is a reflection of the health of the community. Kentucky is missing an incredible opportunity to not only keep children safe at school but also to implement a system of improving long term health in the commonwealth."

Princess Health and Kentucky Center for Economic Policy report warns about impact of Bevin's proposed Medicaid changes. Princessiccia

Princess Health and Kentucky Center for Economic Policy report warns about impact of Bevin's proposed Medicaid changes. Princessiccia

economy federal spending health reform jobs Medicaid obamacare Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act politics prevention state budget state government

Gusty 13:15 Add Comment

By Danielle Ray

Kentucky Health News

A research group with a liberal outlook warned Monday that Republican Gov. Matt Bevin should be careful in changing the state Medicaid program.

The Kentucky Center for Economic Policy said the state�s expansion of Medicaid eligibility under Democratic Gov. Steve Beshear has increased health screenings and job growth in health care.

Tobacco counseling and interventions increased 169 percent from 2013 to 2014, the first year of the expansion, the report noted. Influenza vaccinations went up 143 percent and breast cancer screenings increased 111 percent, it noted.

In addition, Medicaid expansion brought Kentucky health-care providers nearly $3 billion through mid-2015 and resulted in a 4.6 percent job growth in the health-care sector from 2014 to 2016, according to the report.

�No matter how you look at Medicaid expansion in Kentucky, it�s clear it has had a positive effect on access to health care that will improve our state�s economy and quality of life,� Jason Bailey, executive director of KCEP, said in a news release.

However, Bevin says the state can�t afford to have more than a fourth of its population on Medicaid and is seeking a waiver from the federal government to make changes in the program, such as �skin in the game� for beneficiaries: co-payments, deductibles or health savings accounts, as used in a year-old experiment in Indiana, which he has cited as an example.

The KCEP reports says the Medicaid waiver Bevin is seeking could result in additional costs to recipients and benefit changes. Arkansas was the first state to design a Medicaid expansion using such a waiver. So far, five other states have implemented similar waiver-based programs.

Waiver programs differ from standard Medicaid expansion in that they utilize some or all of the following: health savings accounts, a cost-sharing account to be used for health care expenses; lockouts, periods in which recipients who have been dis-enrolled for failure to pay premiums are barred from re-enrolling; and premium assistance, the use of Medicaid funds to buy private insurance plans.

These waivers are designed to grant states the freedom to enact experimental programs within Medicaid, so long as the programs continue to reflect the overall goal of Medicaid, increasing coverage of low-income individuals and improving overall health care, as well as efficiency and stability of health care programs that serve that population.

The Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky, which convened a meeting of Medicaid stakeholders last week, is holding off on making judgments of the proposed waiver program. �We believe that diverse input is essential to sustaining these gains, and to continue improving our health care system and health outcomes in Kentucky,� said Susan Zepeda, president of the foundation.

Zepeda said research the foundation has funded has shown a greater decrease in the number of Kentuckians who lack health insurance than any other state, which she attributes largely to Medicaid expansion adding about 400,000 Kentuckians to the rolls.

More than 1.4 million Kentuckians are enrolled in Medicaid, 39 percent of whom are children. Nearly 32 percent are enrolled under the expansion: childless adults in households that earn less than 138 percent of the federal poverty line, currently $33,000 for a family of four.

The KCEP report also asserts that Kentucky�s Medicaid benefits are on par with those of other states, specifically that 12 out of 13 of Kentucky�s optional benefits are also covered in at least 40 other states and territories. Kentucky Medicaid only covers services that are deemed medically necessary.

KCEP noted that Medicaid is a partnership in which the federal government funds a minimum of half of traditional Medicaid spending in each state, with poorer states receiving a larger federal match. In Kentucky, the federal share is about 70 percent. For people covered by the expansion, the federal government is paying the full cost through this year, but the state will pay 5 percent in 2017, rising in annual steps to the law�s limit of 10 percent in 2020.

The full KCEP report is at http://kypolicy.org.

Princess Health and Ky. Republicans like Indiana Medicaid plan, but head of Medicaid directors' group says Ind. isn't far enough along to be a model. Princessiccia

Princess Health and Ky. Republicans like Indiana Medicaid plan, but head of Medicaid directors' group says Ind. isn't far enough along to be a model. Princessiccia

federal spending governor health insurance Medicaid state budget state government

Gusty 15:31 Add Comment

Gov. Matt Bevin and other Republicans have said they want to make Kentucky's version of Medicaid look like Indiana's, but a leading Medicaid official says that Indiana's program hasn't proven itself to save money or improve health, so it's unlikely other states will be allowed to use it as a model, Phil Galewitz reports for Kaiser Health News and The Washington Post.

Matt Salo, executive director of the National Association of Medicaid Directors, told Galewitz, �Other states have looked at it, but the Obama administration has made it pretty clear that Indiana is going to be a test case and much evaluation will need to be done before they approve any more like it.�

Now Bevin's office says it is looking at other states, too, as it negotiates with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, trying to come up with a revised program to save money, perhaps by August.

"The Indiana model is just one of many models that we are looking at for influence in crafting a plan that is specifically tailored for the needs of Kentucky," Bevin spokeswoman Jessica Ditto said in an e-mail. "We are working closely, and in good faith, with HHS as this process moves forward and have confidence that what we offer for their consideration will be a thoughtful, deliberate and unique plan that will improve health outcomes in a sustainable manner."

Under federal health reform, then-Gov. Steve Beshear expanded Medicaid to those in the state with incomes up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level, adding 400,000 people. The federal government pays for this expanded population through this year, but then the state will be responsible for 5 percent of the expansion, rising to the reform law's limit of 10 percent in 2020.

Bevin has said that Kentucky's revised program should require its members to have "skin in the game," and that the state cannot continue to pay for the health insurance of "able-bodied adults."

Healthy Indiana Plan

That sounds like Indiana, which has monthly fees and co-payments and refers its participants to a work program.

Even if it is just a dollar, everyone on Medicaid in Indiana pays something, whether it's through a monthly fee or through co-payments.

The Healthy Indiana Plan has two levels, HIP Plus and HIP Basic. Both plans offer incentives for using preventive services, but HIP Plus, which requires a monthly fee, also includes dental and vision services.

Those fees go into an account that is like a health savings account and is used for the first $2,500 of medical expenses each year. The state of Indiana pays the bulk of the $2,500 and if the participant's health-care expenses exceed this amount, the state will pay for the additional care at no cost to the individual.

HIP Plus is considered the best value and is available to everyone in the state with income below 138 percent of the federal poverty level. The consequences for not paying the required monthly fee vary by income level.

Those in HIP plus who make at or below the poverty level and fail to pay the fee are moved down to HIP Basic plan, which requires co-payments of up to $8 per service and $75 for each inpatient hospital stay. Both plans have a co-payment for using the emergency room for non-emergency reasons, $8 the first time and then $25 per visit thereafter.

HIP Basic members who make more than the poverty level are locked out of coverage for six months if they fail to make their monthly payment.

"No other program has been allowed to require health spending accounts, much less threaten to yank coverage for a person not paying in," Galewitz writes, paraphrasing Salo.

HIP members who are unemployed or work less than 20 hours a week are referred to available employment, work search and job training programs to help them gain employment or find better employment. This is a free and voluntary program and does not affect the receipt of benefits.

All members of HIP Plus must pay something. About half of Indiana Medicaid members have annual incomes below $600; they must pay a $1 monthly premium.

The monthly fee adjusts with income and family size. For example, a single person who makes $16,242, the maximum for expanded Medicaid, pays $27.07 per month to get HIP Plus, or $324.85 per year. A family of two could make as much as $21,983 and would pay $36.64 or $439.68 per year; and a family of four could make $33,465 and would pay $55.78, or $669.36 per year. Information comes from the eligibility calculator on the Healthy Indiana Plan website.

Is Indiana's plan working?

Indiana health officials told Galewitz that 94 percent of those who have signed up for HIP Plus continue to pay their fees.

Michelle Stoughton, senior director of government relations for Indianapolis-based Anthem Insurance Cos., called that a success. She said nearly 75 percent of Anthem's members on this HIP Plus have visited a dentist, and 65 percent sought vision care in the first three months of coverage. Anthem is one of three private insurers providing coverage under the Healthy Indiana Plan.

�What we heard for years .?.?. is that these people won�t pay and don�t have the ability to pay,� Stoughton told Galewitz. �But this has turned those arguments around and been able to show that people do want to be engaged.�

Indiana's hospitals and doctors support the Healthy Indiana Plan, mostly because the state increased their Medicaid rates, hospitals by an average of 20 percent and doctors' reimbursements by an average of 25 percent, Galewitz reports.

"As a result, Medicaid has gained more than 5,300 providers in the past year, and patients report few problems getting care," he writes. But he also noted that about 2,200 members have lost coverage since it began in May 2015 because they didn't pay their monthly fees.

Critics of Indiana's plan worry that the monthly payments and complicated structure will keep the poor from getting care. which goes against the core goal of Medicaid expansion, Galewitz writes. In addition, some conservative groups say the program may be more expensive than traditional Medicaid, because it provides dental and vision care and pays providers more. Others say that the red tape in the plan exceeds that of any state's Medicaid expansion.

The state had also hoped third parties would step up and help the poor pay for their monthly contributions, but this hasn't happened, Joan Alker, executive director of the Georgetown University Center for Children and Families, told Galewitz. She said, �It�s premature for Indiana to take a victory lap.�

Princess Health and CDC says state spends less than 8% of what it should on preventing use of tobacco; companies spend 13 times as much.Princessiccia

Princess Health and CDC says state spends less than 8% of what it should on preventing use of tobacco; companies spend 13 times as much.Princessiccia

advertising children's health federal government smoking smoking cessation state budget state budgets state governments tobacco tobacco prevention youth

Gusty 16:43 Add Comment

Kentucky spends only 7.6 percent of what it should spend on preventing the use of tobacco, the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says in its latest annual report on the subject.

The state spent $4.33 million on tobacco-control programs in 2011, the year covered by the report. The CDC said spending of $57.2 million was called for, since 29 percent of Kentuckians smoked that year. Tobacco-related illnesses are estimated to cost Kentuckians $3.3 billion a year.

South Carolina and Texas, which spent 6.5 percent and 7 percent of the recommended amounts, were also singled out for criticism by the CDC. Nationally, states spend less than 18 percent of what they should, $3.7 billion, in the agency's view. "Only Alaska and North Dakota funded programs at the CDC-recommended levels, $10.7 million and $9.3 million, respectively," Samantha Ehlinger of McClatchy Newspapers reports.

Read more here: http://www.kentucky.com/2015/06/25/3918046/cdc-says-kentucky-isnt-spending.html#storylink=cpy

"States that made larger investments in tobacco prevention and control have seen larger declines in cigarettes sales than the United States as a whole, and the prevalence of smoking has declined faster as spending for tobacco control programs has increased," the CDC report said. "Evidence suggests that funding tobacco prevention and control efforts at the levels recommended . . . could achieve larger and more rapid reductions in tobacco use and associated morbidity and mortality."

In contrast to the state spending of $658 million on tobacco control, tobacco companies spent more than 13 times as much on advertising and promotion in 2011: $8.8 billion, or $24 million per day, the report noted.

"During the same period, more than 3,200 youth younger than 18 years of age smoked their first cigarette and another 2,100 youth and young adults who are occasional smokers progressed to become daily smokers," the report said. "If current rates continue, 5.6 million Americans younger than 18 years of age who are alive today are projected to die prematurely from smoking-related disease. However, the tobacco-use epidemic can be markedly reduced by implementing interventions that are known to work."

For the CDC's latest comprehensive report on tobacco use in Kentucky, with data from 2012, click here. For county-by-county figures on adults smoking in Kentucky in 2011-13, click here.

Princess Health and Princess Health andPaducah Sun editorial criticizing Medicaid expansion was off base; Beshear sends the newspaper a response.Princessiccia

Princess Health and Princess Health andPaducah Sun editorial criticizing Medicaid expansion was off base; Beshear sends the newspaper a response.Princessiccia

health reform jobs Medicaid newspapers obamacare research state budget state government taxes

Gusty 18:58 Add Comment

By Al Cross
Kentucky Health News

The Paducah Sun relied on incomplete and inaccurate information for an editorial Thursday that criticized Gov. Steve Beshear's expansion of the Medicaid program under federal health-care reform, and the governor is complaining about it.

The newspaper said Beshear had created a "financial mess" because when he was running for governor, he "told our editorial board that he had 'no idea where we would get the money' to pay the state's share of the cost of Medicaid expansion if the Affordable Care Act was passed. He still doesn't."

Actually, when he announced the Medicaid expansion a year ago, Beshear cited a study by the international accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers which concluded that the expansion would pay for itself by adding patients to the health-care system and creating 17,000 jobs by the 2020-21 fiscal year.

The editorial made no mention of the study. Beshear's communications director, Kerri Richardson, told the paper Tuesday that the editorial was "grossly misleading, and we are disappointed that your editorial board has chosen not to seek information from anyone in our administration regarding actions on the Affordable Care Act."

In the formal response from Beshear, submitted for publication, the governor says the editorial "was so breathtakingly disingenuous that it demands a factual response. That a newspaper of this size would trot out such unsubstantiated tripe disguised as analysis is a disservice to its readers."

Sun Editor Steve Wilson said the editorial was written by Publisher Jim Paxton, who did not return a call seeking comment. The Sun's editorials generally support conservative causes and Republicans; Beshear is a Democrat and the only Southern governor to both expand Medicaid and create a health-insurance exchange under the reform law.

The editorial also misstated when Kentucky would have to start sharing in the cost of care for the newly eligible Medicaid recipients, those with household incomes between 69 percent and 138 percent of the federal poverty level. It cited a study by the conservative Heritage Foundation which "suggests that even when savings from ACA managed-care features are added in, the expansion will cost Kentucky an additional $846 million between 2014 and 2022."

Actually, the state will not have to pay anything for the newly eligibles until 2017 because the federal government will pick up the entire cost until then. In 2017, the state will have to pay 5 percent of their cost, rising to a cap of 10 percent in 2020. Republican critics of the law have said the cap will have to be raised, but have not found fault with the study.

Studies by the accounting firm and the University of Louisville's Urban Studies Center, drawing on Congressional Budget Office data, estimated the state would actually gain $802 million through the 2020-21 fiscal year from Medicaid expansion. "Without expansion, our budget would see a negative impact of nearly $40 million, because we would be forced to absorb costs such as increased payments to hospitals for uncompensated care, " Beshear wrote. "In other words, the state would lose money if we didn�t expand." Click here for the rest of his reply.

Beshear said in his response that he sent the Sun an op-ed piece a year ago this week explaining the facts, but the paper apparently refused to publish it.

Princess Health and Princess Health andLouisville jails sign up inmates for health coverage to save the state money; other jails around state may follow suit.Princessiccia

Princess Health and Princess Health andLouisville jails sign up inmates for health coverage to save the state money; other jails around state may follow suit.Princessiccia

health insurance health reform local government Medicaid obamacare Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act state budget

Gusty 10:48 Add Comment

Louisville jails are holding daily health insurance sign-ups for released inmates, Chris Kenning reports for The Courier-Journal.

Most inmates qualify for expanded Medicaid under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and Medicaid applications can be made at any time, not just during the annual sign-up period. Officials told Kenning that after the first four days, they had processed 18 applications, mostly for Medicaid.

The benefit to prisons and jails is twofold: Inmate hospitalizations lasting more than 24 hours can be billed to Medicaid, and getting coverage for released inmates provides insurance to a population that has a high rate of chronic disease, substance abuse and mental illness -- conditions that often bring them back to prison, Kenning writes.

This treatment is often only a temporary fix, because repeat offenders fail to continue their treatment when released because of a lack of health insurance, officials acknowledged.

"I know some people will think, 'I can't afford health insurance myself. Now a person in jail gets access to health care?'" Mark Bolton, director of Metro Corrections, told Kenning. "But taxpayers are paying for these people anyway."

Kenning reports that in Louisville, "Metro Corrections' health care costs make up $9 million of its $52 million budget � a result of treating medical conditions including diabetes, heart disease, infections and drug problems." The jails house an average of about 2,000 people.

U.S. Sen. Mitch McConnell does not support the signups, telling The Courier-Journal that it adds burdens to an already strained Medicaid program that is hard-pressed to find enough doctors willing to accept Medicaid patients. "This is yet another disturbing aspect of a profoundly troubling piece of legislation," he told Kenning.

Plans to expand to other jails and other parts of the state are in the works, said Barbara Gordon of the Kentuckiana Regional Planning and Development Agency, a Louisville-area government clearinghouse that provides "Kynectors" to help people sign up on Kynect, the state health-insurance exchange. They now spend two hours a day at the jail and hope to eventually have someone there full time, Bolton told Kenning.

About a third of people going in or out of prisons and jails would qualify for expanded Medicaid, and 24 percent would qualify for subsidized private insurance, estimates Dr. Fred Osher, director of health systems and services policy for the nonpartisan Council of State Governments Justice Center.

The state Department of Corrections projects that by shifting the costs of those 24-hour hospital stays to Medicaid, the state prison system would save more than $5 million a year, Kenning reports. The system has seen health costs rise to more than $54 million this year, from $34 million in 2004.

Princess Health and Weekly paper in Hazard says Beshear should expand Medicaid.Princessiccia

Princess Health and Weekly paper in Hazard says Beshear should expand Medicaid.Princessiccia

Affordable Care Act Medicaid newspapers Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act state budget state government

Gusty 15:16 Add Comment

Gov. Steve Beshear should expand the Medicaid program for the poor under federal health reform to improve the health and welfare of Kentuckians, The Hazard Herald said in its editorial this week.

"We�re tired of reading report after report listing the health of Kentucky�s people at the bottom nationally," the weekly newspaper said. "That is especially the case in Eastern Kentucky, where here in Perry County we ranked as the 119th unhealthiest county out of 120, according to a recent study. In fact, the vast majority of the bottom 20 counties are here in Eastern Kentucky. There are many dire needs in our region of the state, from jobs to education to better access to health care. Here is one instance where our government, which the people fund, can opt to very possibly improve the lives of its citizens."

The federal government would pay the costs of expanding Medicaid to people in households with incomes up to 138 percent of the poverty level from 2014 through 2016. The state would pay 3 percent in 2017, rising to 10 percent in 2020. The editorial noted critics' warnings about costs, and a study predicting that expansion would increase the state's total Medicaid costs only 6.3 percent. "But, in truth, this is simply a monetary argument from interests on both sides of the debate," the paper said. "We feel the greatest interest belongs to the people of Kentucky. We feel the greatest priority should be placed on improving the health and welfare of our people." (Read more)

Princess Health and If Republican governors are agreeing to expand Medicaid after lobbying by hospitals, can Beshear be far behind?.Princessiccia

Princess Health and If Republican governors are agreeing to expand Medicaid after lobbying by hospitals, can Beshear be far behind?.Princessiccia

Affordable Care Act federal spending General Assembly health care access health insurance health reform hospitals legislature Medicaid politics state budget state governments

Gusty 07:29 Add Comment

By Al Cross
Kentucky Health News

Florida Gov. Rick Scott's surprising announcement that he would use federal health-care reform money to expand the Medicaid program to households earning up to 138 percent of the poverty level "means the dominoes are falling," says Ron Pollack, executive director of Families USA, a consumer group that lobbied for the law. And another domino seems likely to be Democratic Kentucky Gov. Steve Beshear, without involvement by the state legislature.

Beshear has said he will expand Medicaid if Kentucky can afford it, and has mentioned that the state can reserve the right to pull out of the deal in 2017, when it must start paying a small but increasing share of the cost, reaching 10 percent in 2020. Scott used the same qualification.

Pollack told The New York Times that the message sent by seven Republican governors' acceptance of the deal is  �Even though I may not have supported and even strongly opposed the Affordable Care Act, it would be harmful to the citizens of my state if I didn�t opt into taking these very substantial federal dollars to help people who truly need it.� The GOP governors (of states outlined in Times map below) have said they will expand the program partly to protect rural hospitals and the poor.

"The change of heart for some Republican governors has come after vigorous lobbying by health industry players, particularly hospitals," the Times notes. "Hospital associations around the country signed off on Medicaid cuts under the health care law on the assumption that their losses would be more than offset by new paying customers, including many insured by Medicaid. . . . Every few days, state hospital associations and advocates for poor people issue reports asserting that the economic benefits of expanding Medicaid would outweigh the costs." (Read more)

Kentucky Hospital Association President Michael Rust said the trade group is for "universal coverage" by whatever means but is not lobbying Beshear for Medicaid expansion. "We assume he is" going to expand it, Rust said in an interview today. He said the association has not taken a position on bills that would require legislative approval of expansion and the health-insurance exchange being set up under the reform law. The legislation, Senate Bill 39 and SB40, passed the Republican-controlled Senate on party-line votes today, and are expected to die in the Democratic-majority House.

Senate Majority Floor Leader Damon Thayer said the bills were aimed at reining in "big daddy government." Here's a video from cn|2:

Kentucky Health News is an independent news service of the Institute for Rural Journalism and Community Issues at the University of Kentucky, with support from the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky.

Princess Health and Appalachian Regional Healthcare asks federal judge to make managed-care firm keep it under contract.Princessiccia

Princess Health and Appalachian Regional Healthcare asks federal judge to make managed-care firm keep it under contract.Princessiccia

Appalachia health insurance hospitals jobs Medicaid politics poverty rural health state budget state government

Gusty 12:45 Add Comment

Appalachian Regional Healthcare, a hospital chain in Eastern Kentucky and southern West Virginia, is seeking an emergency injunction by a federal judge ordering Coventry Cares to let its Kentucky members continue receiving services from the hospitals, and to avoid widespread layoffs the chain says will happen if the judge doesn't intervene, reports Bill Estep of the Lexington Herald-Leader. Coventry Cares is one of three state-approved companies to provide managed care services through Medicaid. It said it would cancel its ARH contract after Friday, which would affect about 25,000 Medicaid recipients.

With a few exceptions, Coventry members would lose access to treatment or have to travel long distances to get to other facilities approved by the company, which ARH and officials in affected counties say would be difficult for most because they don't have money or reliable transportation to make the trip. Coventry spokesman Matthew Eyles said the company would continue paying for some services at ARH hospitals, including ob-gyn services to women who are more than 12 weeks pregnant and have a relationship with an ARH doctor.

The state switched to managed-care last year as a way to save money, but as Estep reports, the move has been "rocky." Providers have complained about delayed payments from the companies and their cumbersome pre-approval processes for treatments. ARH sued Coventry and Kentucky Spirit, another provider, claiming the companies owed more than $18 million for services ARH had provided.  Estep notes, "The state allowed another managed care provider not to include ARH in its network, which meant a lot of higher-risk, higher-cost patients ended up covered by Coventry, the company said." The company also said the state failed to implement a method to assess risks that would adequately compensate managed-care providers who have more high-risk patients."

ARH and its Coventry patients think the company is trying to get more money out of the state. Many of ARH's patients are covered by Coventry, and ARH spokeswoman said about 300 to 400 jobs would be cut if Coventry cancels its contract. State officials are encouraging continues negotiation between ARH and Coventry. (Read more)

Meanwhile, Bardstown pediatrician and Passport Health Plan board member James Hendrick wrote a letter to the editor of The Courier-Journal offering Passport's services to "help the state get Medicaid back on track." He said he's been very impressed with the nonprofit's "strong and engaged provider network, and an intense focus on delivering services at a cost that doesn�t diminish quality," adding that because Passport is a nonprofit, it's not concerned with appeasing shareholders. Passport has been managing Medicaid in the Louisville region for several years.

Princess Health and Beshear vetoes parts of budget, but health spending is intact.Princessiccia

Princess Health and Beshear vetoes parts of budget, but health spending is intact.Princessiccia

cancer child abuse children colorectal cancer General Assembly legislation legislature Medicaid seniors state budget state government

Gusty 14:26 Add Comment

Though Gov. Steve Beshear vetoed 45 parts of the state budget yesterday evening, health-related spending was safe from the cut.

The budget will help reduce caseloads for social workers who investigate child abuse and neglect, funds colon cancer screenings for 4,000 uninsured Kentuckians, substance-abuse treatment for Medicaid recipients and includes funding for an elder abuse registry to protect senior citizens from unscrupulous caretakers.

"This is the most difficult budget I have ever drafted, and it will also be a challenge to implement and manage over the next two years," the governor said in a statement.

In the two-year, $19 billion budget, Beshear voted more than three dozen line-item appropriations, including "portions of the General Fund budget that limited his ability to manage the state's budget or spent money that doesn't exist," reports Beth Musgrave of the Lexington Herald-Leader.

He also cut some earmarks, including $100,000 for Actors Theatre of Louisville and $150,000 for the International Mystery Writers' Festival in Owensboro. "I am vetoing these parts because they identify new spending earmarks yet the General Assembly failed to appropriate additional funds to finance them," Beshear said. (Read more)