Princess Health andFederal dietary guidelines recommend cutting back on red and processed meat, sugar and refined grains.Princessiccia

Princess Health andFederal dietary guidelines recommend cutting back on red and processed meat, sugar and refined grains.Princessiccia

food nutrition obesity sugar

Gusty 20:09 Add Comment

The Department of Agriculture and the Department of Health and Human Services have released proposed 2015 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. The guidelines, released every five years, "provide authoritative advice about consuming fewer calories, making informed food choices, and being physically active to attain and maintain a healthy weight, reduce risk of chronic disease, and promote overall health," says USDA.

It shouldn't come as a surprise that the 2015 guidelines recommend eating healthier foods, while cutting back on less healthy alternatives. "The committee basically recommended Americans take up a diet that is higher in vegetables, fruits, whole grains, low- or non-fat dairy products, seafood, legumes and nuts," Chris Clayton reports for DTN The Progressive Farmer. "We should cut back on red and processed meats and sugar-sweetened foods, drinks and refined grains. And we should be moderate in our alcohol."

Recommended cutbacks of certain foods have not gone over well with those food producers, who met this week to give feedback on the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee's recommendations, Clayton writes. The North American Meat Institute argued that "lean meat, poultry, red and processed meats should all be part of a healthy dietary pattern because they are nutrient-dense protein."

Shalene McNeill, a nutritionist for the National Cattlemen's Beef Association, "told the committee that its recommendation to exclude lean meat ignores decades of nutrition science," Clayton writes. McNeill said Americans should be encouraged to eat more lean meat, along with fruits, vegetables and whole grains. Grain, sugar and milk producers also expressed displeasure with the proposed rules.

Most nutritionists have embraced the proposed rules, but say the key is getting people to adopt them, Andrea McDaniels reports for The Baltimore Sun. Among those rules is limiting sugar intake to 200 or less calories, or 10 percent of total calories, per day. Currently, Americans get about 13 percent of their calories, or 268 calories, from added sugar.

"On the flip side, some foods once shunned are now accepted," McDaniels writes. "Research has found that cholesterol-high foods are no longer believed to contribute to high blood cholesterol, so people can now indulge in shrimp, eggs and other foods that were once off limits, the panel said. Rather than focus on cholesterol, people should curb saturated fat to about 8 percent of the diet."

The panel also said "up to five cups of coffee a day are fine, so long they are not flavored with lots of milk and sugar," McDaniels writes. "The panel also singled out the Mediterranean diet�rich in fish and chicken, fruits and vegetables, nuts, whole grains, olive oil and legumes�for its nutritional value."

Princess Health and Princess Health andStudy: Banning sugary drinks from SNAP would reduce obesity and Type 2 diabetes; subsidy would boost fruit consumption.Princessiccia

Princess Health and Princess Health andStudy: Banning sugary drinks from SNAP would reduce obesity and Type 2 diabetes; subsidy would boost fruit consumption.Princessiccia

diabetes food stamps fruit nutrition obesity research sugar vegetables

Gusty 08:43 Add Comment

A measure preventing people from purchasing sugar-sweetened beverages through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or food stamps, would significantly reduce obesity and Type 2 diabetes in adults under 65, and adding a subsidy for fruits and vegetables would more than double the number of SNAP participants who meet federal vegetable and fruit consumption guidelines, says a new study published in Health Affairs.

Research has shown that people on food stamps suffer diabetes, heart disease and obesity at higher rates than people who are in the same tax bracket but not on food stamps, Diane Jeanty reports for PBS Newshour. In 2013, these findings prompted 18 mayors from major U.S. cities to write to Congress with a push to ban the use of food stamps to purchase sugar sweetened beverages.

The American Beverage Association pushed back, saying "sugared beverages were being targeted and were not the only causes for obesity," Jeanty writes.

A research team led by Dr. Sanjay Basu, an assistant professor of medicine at the Stanford University School of Medicine, conducted the study to determine how banning sugared beverages could affect the SNAP population�s level of risk for these diseases, Jeanty reports. They used a survey by the federal Centers for Disease Control, which assesses the nutritional status of adults and children, and combined it with current information on SNAP.

The study had two models, one that banned sugary beverages�excluding 100 percent fruit juice�and another that offered an incentive for SNAP participants to receive a 30 cent credit for each dollar spent on fruit and vegetable purchases. The study factored in metabolism rates and demographics such as race, age, gender and income to test the effects of the proposed measures, Jeanty reports.

They found that with a simulated ban, a person would reduce his or her calorie intake by 24 per day. They also found that obesity rates decreased 2.4 percent and type 2 Diabetes rates dropped 1.7 percent�or 240,000 people�Jeanty reports. The simulated subsidy, did not, however, have a significant impact on overall diabetes and obesity.

The study also found that by adding a simulated subsidy on fruits and vegetables, SNAP participants increased their consumption from 1/4 cup to 3 cups per day. However, increasing the amount of fruits and vegetables consumed is not enough to influence the reduction of diabetes and obesity on a national scale, according to Basu. �There would also have to be further reforms to also reduce the consumption of sugary beverages,� Basu told Jeanty.

The Illinois Public Health Institute, addressing a proposed ban in Illinois, found that SNAP participants would still purchase sugared beverages with their own money, even if they were banned, Jeanty reports. But Basu says that his study accounted for this consideration. Basu said it is time to perform a controlled study instead of a simulation model, Jeanty writes.

Princess Health and Princess Health andStudents in 2 Appalachian Ohio high schools help reduce classmates' consumption of sugary drinks, a bane in the region.Princessiccia

Princess Health and Princess Health andStudents in 2 Appalachian Ohio high schools help reduce classmates' consumption of sugary drinks, a bane in the region.Princessiccia

Appalachia child obesity nutrition obesity research schools sugar youth

Gusty 10:38 Add Comment

In a region where sweet-tea and soda is more popular than water, student-led groups in Appalachian Ohio were successful in reducing the amount of sugary drinks students consumed, reports The Ohio State University's Center for Clinical and Translational Science.

As part of the study, student-led teen advisory councils in the two Southern Ohio high schools implemented a 30-day intervention called "Sodabriety" to reduce the amount of sugary drinks students consumed. Results of the study were published in the March issue of the Journal of School Health.

The councils informed students about the risks of sugary drinks, put green ribbons on students' cars to remind them of the dangers, offered daily "sugar facts" during the morning announcements, performed soda-themed rap songs at student events and gave away water bottles with a "What's in your cup?" slogan.

The efforts paid off. Not only did some teens completely give up sugared drinks, but water consumption nearly doubled. Some students even reported weight loss, less acne and increased energy, Smith said.

A typical 20-ounce soda contains 15 to 18 teaspoons of sugar and upwards of 240 calories. A 64-ounce fountain cola drink could have up to 700 calories, says a fact sheet from the Harvard School of Public Health.

Kentucky high-school students rank third in the U.S. in obesity, with 33.4 percent overweight or obese, according to the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Consumption of sugary beverages is a problem in Appalachia, where obesity contributes heavily to the region's health issues.

�Teens who grow up in this region are ultimately more likely to die from cancer, diabetes and heart disease than any other place in the nation, and obesity is the common risk factor for all of those illnesses,� said nurse Laureen Smith, one of the researchers. �A child�s odds of becoming obese increases almost two times with each additional daily serving of a sugar sweetened drink, and Appalachian kids drink more of these types of beverages than kids in other parts of the country.�

Smith added, �Sugar sweetened beverages are the largest source of sugar in the American diet. For some teens, they account for almost one-third of daily caloric intake, and that amount is even higher among Appalachian adolescents. If we can help teens reduce sugared-beverage intake now, we might be able to help them avoid obesity and other diseases later in life.�

Princess Health and Kids are still eating too much sugar, regardless of parents' income, and they're getting most of it at home.Princessiccia

Princess Health and Kids are still eating too much sugar, regardless of parents' income, and they're getting most of it at home.Princessiccia

childhood obesity nutrition processed food sugar

Gusty 16:09 Add Comment

By Tara Kaprowy
Kentucky Health News

American children's sugar consumption is down, but kids are still eating too much sugar, and they are getting most of it at home.

So says a new study from the National Center for Health Statistics, which also found parent income is not playing a part in how much sugar kids are consuming. "We found that all kids are eating a lot of added sugars," said Cynthia Ogden, the study's co-author and an epidemiologist with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (One study found kids in low-income families are drinking more juice than recommended, however.)

The study found sugar consumption has dropped to 17 percent of total caloric intake, from 22 percent, but 17 percent is still well higher than federal guidelines, which say total discretionary calories, including added sugar and solid fat, should account for only 5 to 15 percent of total daily caloric intake.

Sugar consumption may have declined because kids are consuming less sugar when they're not at home, thanks to bans or limits on sugary drinks at schools, said Dr. Wendy Slusser, an associate clinical professor of medicine at the Mattel Children's Hospital at the University of California. Kentucky has such a ban.

Most of the sugar is coming from food, not beverages, Linda Carroll reports for MSNBC. About 16 percent of kids' calorie intake comes from "added sugars," such those added to breads, cakes, jams, chocolate and ice cream. Those numbers do not include sugars that naturally occur in food, such as in fruit or fruit juice.

Going forward, the goal is to address how parents are feeding their children. "This is an opportunity for families," Slusser said. "There are estimates now that we could shift children's weights back to 1970s levels if we could just take 350 calories out of a kid's diet each day."

One way to do so is using water to replace sports drinks and those with 10 percent fruit juice. Giving kids Cheerios rather than Honey Nut Cheerios � or any cereal that's lower in sugar � also helps. Reading nutrition labels, avoiding processed foods and planning ahead for healthy snacks and nutritious dinners can also solve the problem. "Once there's a routine, parents can integrate healthier foods into their children's diets," Slusser said. "When you're always eating on the fly, you end up eating too many processed foods." (Read more)

Kentucky Health News is a service of the Institute for Rural Journalism and Community Issues, based in the School of Journalism and Telecommunications at the University of Kentucky, with support from the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky.