Showing posts with label insurance coverage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label insurance coverage. Show all posts

Friday, 3 June 2016

Princess Health and  Health advocacy group says revised Medicaid program should improve health and manage cost, without creating barriers. Princessiccia

Princess Health and Health advocacy group says revised Medicaid program should improve health and manage cost, without creating barriers. Princessiccia

By Melissa Patrick
Kentucky Health News

A health-care advocacy group says the redesign of the Medicaid program should build on the expansion of eligibility and not include any more costs for patients.

�Kentucky has made tremendous gains in improving the health of its people since the expansion of Medicaid. More Kentuckians are receiving preventive services, substance use treatment and other critically needed care than ever before,� Emily Beauregard, executive director of Kentucky Voices for Health, said in a news release. �Any changes to the program should build on this success.�

Under federal health reform, then-Gov. Steve Beshear expanded Medicaid to households with incomes up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level, which added about 400,000 more Kentuckians to the rolls. The federal government pays for the expansion through this year, but next year the state will be responsible for 5 percent, rising in annual steps to the reform law's limit of 10 percent in 2020. In all, about 1.3 million Kentuckians get free health care through Medicaid.

Gov. Matt Bevin has said the state can't afford to have more than a fourth of its population on Medicaid and has charged his administration to come up with a revised program that will improve health outcomes while making the expansion financially sustainable. Bevin hopes to accomplish this through a waiver from the federal government.

Bevin has said he favors a waiver program like Indiana's, which includes premiums and co-pays in some tiers of coverage, but has also said that he is not limited by this model and will develop a waiver to best fit the needs of Kentucky.

Kentucky Voices for Health is a coalition  of organizations that favor federal health reform, some of of which lobby the government. It said changes should engage consumers in their care and develop new ways to deliver care, without any obstacles to coverage such as premiums.

�Coverage is foundational,� Rich Seckel, executive director of Kentucky Equal Justice Center, said in the release. �It empowers us with tools to achieve and maintain health.�

The coalition also said the program should focus on coordination of care in areas with high use, and build on Kentucky's Health Data Trust, which provides complete and transparent information about healthcare utilization and outcomes to improve public health and quality of care delivery. Click here for the full report.

The group stressed the importance of meaningful stakeholder input to ensure the waiver is designed to meet the unique needs of Kentucky. So far, the administration has had no formal stakeholder meetings on the issue.

Under federal law, states seeking a waiver must hold at least two public hearings; one before it is submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the second after CMS accepts the application.

Amanda Stamper, press secretary to Bevin, told The Courier-Journal that the administration welcomed "this sort of thoughtful input," and when asked if the waiver would include any premiums or co-pays said, "Everything is on the table and no decisions have been finalized."

Thursday, 26 May 2016

Princess Health and  Medicaid stakeholders OK with healthy behavior incentives, oppose penalizing recipients who don't take part in cost sharing. Princessiccia

Princess Health and Medicaid stakeholders OK with healthy behavior incentives, oppose penalizing recipients who don't take part in cost sharing. Princessiccia

By Melissa Patrick and Al Cross
Kentucky Health News

Groups of people concerned about changes in Kentucky's Medicaid program are open to the state offering incentives for healthy behaviors, but they don't want to penalize recipients who can't or won't pay premiums, deductibles or co-payments.

So reports the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky, which convened a meeting May 12 to hear from people with stakes in the program: individual health-care providers, health systems, consumers, consumer advocates, payers, public-health professionals and representatives of higher education.

�Participants were unified in opposing penalties to enforce cost-sharing provisions� such as premiums, deductibles or co-payments, the foundation's consultant said in a report on the meeting.

However, they supported cost sharing for procedures not deemed medically necessary and �had diverse perspectives on this matter, ranging from opposing any cost-sharing in Medicaid to proposing specific premium and co-payment amounts,� such as $5 monthly premiums.

Also, �Participants were generally very supportive of implementing incentives for healthy behaviors such as smoking cessation and health risk assessments,� the report said. �Incentives might be reductions in the amount of cost-sharing or themselves supportive of healthy behavior,� such as gym membership.

Gov. Matt Bevin has said he wants Medicaid recipients to have "skin in the game" through cost-sharing, arguing that Kentucky can't afford to have more than a fourth of its population getting free medical care.

Under federal health reform, then-Gov, Steve Beshear expanded Medicaid eligibility to households with incomes up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level, adding more than 400,000 more people to the rolls. The federal government pays for the expansion through this year, but next year the state will be responsible for 5 percent, rising in annual steps to the reform law's limit of 10 percent in 2020.

Bevin's administration is working on getting a waiver from the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to create new ways to cover those in the expansion. Six states have such waivers, including Indiana, which Bevin has cited as an example of how Kentucky might change its program.

In Indiana, recipients who pay premiums based on income levels, ranging from $1 a month to 2 percent of income ($27 a month for those at 138 percent of poverty) get expanded benefits and are charged co-payments only for non-emergency use of emergency rooms, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. Those above the poverty level who fail to pay are disenrolled and barred from re-enrolling for six months, in what is known as a "lock-out" rule.

Bevin has indicated that he wants to announce his plan this summer. By law, states that seek a waiver must hold at least two public hearings: one at least 20 days before submitting the application to CMS, and the second after CMS accepts the application.

Stakeholders who attended the foundation's May 12 convening wanted to make sure their voices were heard early on in the process.

"Our goal is to help inform the process of changing the way Kentucky provides Medicaid services to ensure that we maintain the gains achieved under the Affordable Care Act, while also enabling the state to try new methods of ensuring access to affordable quality health care for Medicaid beneficiaries," Foundation President and CEO Susan Zepeda said in a news release.

"The biggest takeaway for me was the energy and commitment in the room," Zepeda said in a telephone interview. "A lot of thoughtfulness clearly went into sharing their experience and making suggestions on how to make the system more cost effective."

Before breaking into groups to offer their imput, stakeholders were given an overview of the state's Medicaid expansion and an overview of an issue brief created by the State Health Access Data Assistance Center at the University of Minnesota that looked at how waiver provisions are set up in five other states. Foundation staff wrote the 25-page "Stakeholder Input Report" that summarized suggestions and concerns and broke them into eight areas:

Cost-sharing and penalties: Health-care providers strongly opposed any cost-sharing, and uniformly opposed to any measure that involved "lock-out" penalties for failure to pay premiums, co-pays or deductibles.

"Our shared experience has been that we�ve been prohibited from denying care if a patient refuses or is unable to pay," the Physical and Oral Health Provider group said. "Therefore, the desired behavior isn�t actually enforced."

The Behavioral Health Provider group offered a compromise: �If the administration chooses to explore lock-outs we recommend that lock-outs be immediately lifted (upon payment) and payment be retroactive to the date the consumer re-enrolls.�

Participants in general were open to the idea of low co-payments, cost-sharing for non-medically necessary services, using Medicaid dollars to pay premiums for employer-sponsored insurance plans and charging co-payments for non-emergency use of the ER. They also agreed that certain groups, like those with chronic illnesses or disabilities, should be exempted.

Incentives: Most post-ACA waiver programs have implemented incentives for healthy behavior, and those at the meeting generally supported implementing evidence-based incentives, such as smoking cessation and health-risk assessments.

Zepeda said that most of the stakeholders wanted to see healthy behavior incentives used as credits against premiums, especially for recipients who can't afford them. "There is a recognition that people have a role to play in their own health care and the health decisions that they make," she said.

Benefits: Benefits include services covered under the health insurance plan. Some participants opposed any changes to current benefits; others wanted to expand existing benefits and still others suggested adding new benefits like housing. All agreed that medically necessary services should be covered for all enrollees.

Reimbursement: Kentucky shifted Medicaid in 2011 to managed care, in which managed-care organizations (usually insurance-company subsidiaries) are paid a flat fee per person as an incentive to limit claims. Providers have complained about the slow and low reimbursement, and participant suggestions included streamlining and accelerating the reimbursement process, increasing provider reimbursement rates, and adding new categories of reimbursed services and providers, like telehealth.

Systems improvement: Participants suggested simplifying administrative processes for providers; expanding providers' scope of practice; adding review panels; reducing the number of managed-care organizations; and creating a single list of drugs for all MCOs.

Health system transformation: Waivers allow states to explore ways to provide care differently through various transformation approaches. Suggestions included creating price transparency, through an all-payer, all-claims database; improving consumer health literacy; and moving beyond coverage issues to addressing access and quality.

�There was also interest among our group in examining a PCMH (patient-centered medical home) or health homes model to promote care coordination, and we feel strongly that pharmacists are essential part of the team and should be used in novel and more expansive ways,� the Colleges and Universities group said.

Evaluation: Waivers require states to perform an evaluation and make it public. Participants agreed that the process should include stakeholders and that findings should be made public periodically.

The Physical and Oral Health Provider group suggested the evaluation should answer the questions, �Have we maintained coverage levels? Have we improved access to care?�

Overarching themes: Many of the stakeholders mentioned two issues that were not included in the issue brief or discussion: integrating behavioral, physical and oral health services, and addressing the wide set of social factors that shape Kentucky's relatively poor health.

�Waivers should include methods to address social determinants of health as these areas are proving most effective in improving outcomes and reducing cost,� the Physical and Oral Health Provider group said. �We encourage inclusion of community health workers, peer support, medical respite care and other innovations to support social needs of patients.�

Zepeda said the Medicaid waiver drafting team faces many challenges. "We consider the rich conversation that happened on May 12 to be the start of the conversation," she said. "We have to find the cost effective win/win strategies that can reduce the cost of Medicaid going forward and let us continue to serve this expanded number of Kentuckians who now have health insurance."

Wednesday, 25 May 2016

Princess Health and Health-insurance companies ask state for rate increases averaging 17 percent; failure of non-profit insurer blamed. Princessiccia

Department of Insurance website
Health insurers want rate increases averaging 22.3 percent in 2017 for individual policies in Kentucky. Counting small-group plans, the overall increase would be 17 percent, "continuing a national trend of hefty hikes as insurers adapt to a market reshaped by President Barack Obama's signature health care law," Adam Beam reports for The Associated Press.

"But the rate increases, if approved by state regulators, do not guarantee double-digit increases in the monthly premiums people have to pay," Beam notes. "The base rate is one of many factors companies use to determine how much someone pays in a monthly premium. Other factors include age, where a person lives and whether the person smokes."

Read more here: http://www.kentucky.com/news/politics-government/article79766917.html#storylink=cpy

Read more here: http://www.kentucky.com/news/politics-government/article79766917.html#storylink=cpy

The average requested increases for individual policies range from 7.6 percent for Aetna Health Inc. to 33.7 percent for Louisville-based Humana Inc., which said recently that it was losing money on Obamacare plans and is working on a merger with Aetna (to which Missouri objected this week). Baptist Health Plan wants 26.68 percent more, Anthem Health Plans 22.9 percent, and CareSource 20.55 percent, all on average.

�The Department of Insurance will fully investigate all proposed rate increase requests to make sure they are warranted,� Commissioner Brian Maynard said in a release. �Insurance rate increases are not specific to Kentucky; states across the nation are dealing with this issue.�

The department said some of the rate increases "appear to be attributed to the failure of the Kentucky Health Cooperative Inc.," a non-profit that was created under the reform law to provide more competition but then was not fully funded by Congress.


"The co-op went bankrupt and was placed into liquidation earlier this year, leaving other insurance companies to cover the more than 51,000 former co-op customers," the department noted. "Many of those customers were high-risk, and Kentucky�s remaining insurers appear to project that those high-risk customers will affect the risk pool." Anthem spokesman Mark Robinson told AP that the expectation of insuring co-op customers was responsible for its rate request.

UnitedHealth Group Inc. said recently that it would stop selling exchange policies in Kentucky, leaving many counties with only one insurer on the exchange. The only company that seeks to sell individual policies statewide is Anthem. It will be the only choice on the exchange in 54 counties.

However, Indianapolis-based Golden Rule Insurance Co., a United subsidiary, will sell "in all counties, off the exchange," the department said. Golden Rule, which still won't sell exchange policies, is seeking a rate increase of 65 percent.

Anthem, Aetna and Baptist will also offer non-exchange policies. Aetna plans to sell in only 10 counties: Jefferson, Fayette, Kenton, Campbell, Boone, Oldham, Trimble, Henry, Owen and Madison. Baptist will sell in 38 counties off the exchange and 20 on the exchange. Humana will sell on the exchange in nine counties (Bourbon, Bullitt, Clark, Fayette, Jefferson, Jessamine, Oldham, Scott and Woodford) and off the exchange in nine (Boone, Bullitt, Campbell, Gallatin, Grant, Jefferson, Kenton, Oldham and Pendleton). CareSource will sell in 61 counties, all on the exchange.

Consumers in Fayette, Jefferson and Oldham counties will have five insurers to choose from on the exchange. Jessamine, Woodford, Bullitt, Henry, Madison and Trimble counties will have four. Thirteen counties will have three choices, and 44 will have two. An Excel spreadsheet listing the policies for each county is available at www.uky.edu/comminfostudies/irjci/Kyhealthinsbycounty2017.xlsx.

The filings are online at insurance.ky.gov/ratefil/default.aspx. Rates must be approved within 60 days of each filing, or no later than July 11.

The administration of Gov. Matt Bevin is dismantling the Kynect health-insurance exchange and will use the federal exchange, HealthCare.gov, as a portal for enrollment in exchange policies.

Wednesday, 11 May 2016

Princess Health and Study shows uninsured rate keeps falling, preventive services are popular and rural hospitals have more uncompensated care. Princessiccia

By Melissa Patrick
Kentucky Health News

The share of Kentuckians without health insurance continues to drop, and new Medicaid enrollees continue to take advantage of free preventive health services, according to an ongoing study of federal health reform's impact in the state.

The Foundation for a Health Kentucky is paying the State Health Access Data Assistance Center at the University of Minnesota more than $280,000 for a three-year study of how the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is affecting Kentuckians.

The report found that the rate of people without health insurance in Kentucky continues to drop.
In December 2015, the uninsured rate was 7.5 percent, down from 9 percent in June 2015. The national rate in December was 11.7 percent. In 2013, before the implementation of the PPACA, Kentucky's uninsured rate was 20.4 percent.

Since December 2013, Kentucky's uninsured rate has dropped 12.9 percentage points, more than double the national decline of 5.6 percentage points, says the report. Uninsurance rates can vary depending on how they are measured. This study used data from the Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index, which produces state-level estimates of coverage twice a year.

"Lack of insurance is a significant barrier to getting necessary health care and preventive services timely," Susan Zepeda, CEO of the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky, said in a news release. "Tracking this and other key information about access to and cost of care in Kentucky helps to inform health policy decisions."

Kentucky also continues to have a lower uninsured rate than its eight nearest surrounding states, although Ohio (7.6 percent) and West Virginia (7.7 percent) are catching up. Missouri (11.6 percent), Tennessee (13 percent) and Virginia (12.6 percent), the three states surrounding Kentucky that did not expand Medicaid, have the highest uninsured rates. (SHADAC map)

And while the state saw a smaller share of new health-insurance customers than the country overall (20 percent versus 39 percent), Kentucky had the largest percentage of re-enrollees (59 percent) return to Kynect, the state's health insurance marketplace, to select plans compared to the rest of the nation (36 percent). Twenty-two percent of Kentuckians were automatically re-enrolled in plans.

Kynect, created by the Democratic administration of Steve Beshear, is in the process of being dismantled by the administration of Republican Gov. Matt Bevin, so Kentuckians will have to sign up for their health insurance through the federal exchange, healthcare.gov, during the next enrollment period which begins Nov. 1, 2016 and runs through Jan. 31, 2017.

Traditional Medicaid enrollees will sign up through Benefind, the state's new one-stop-shop website that can be used to apply for Medicaid, the Kentucky Children's Health Insurance Program (KCHIP), the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, once known as food stamps) and Kentucky Transitional Assistance Program (KTAP).

Expansion of Medicaid added about 400,000 Kentuckians to the program, and many of them have taken advantage of its free services to get screened for diseases and have physical or dental examinations.

Dark blue: traditional Medicaid enrollees
Light blue: Medicaid expansion enrollees
The latest report, which covers the fourth quarter of 2015, says 823 traditional Medicaid enrollees got screened for diabetes, compared to 2,959 Medicaid expansion enrollees. This was also true for colorectal screenings (see graph).

Overall, the study found that Medicaid covered 41,493 dental preventive services, 9,708 breast cancer screenings, 8,276 substance-abuse treatment services, and 5,589 colorectal-cancer screenings to enrollees aged 19-64.

Under federal health reform, Beshear expanded Medicaid to include those with incomes up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level. The federal government pays for this expanded population through this year, but next year the state will be responsible for 5 percent of the expansion, rising in annual steps to the reform law's limit of 10 percent in 2020.

However, the future of the expansion is uncertain. Bevin has said that the state cannot afford its Medicaid population of about 1.3 million, and has charged his administration with designing a new Medicaid program, which will require federal government approval. He told reporters in early May that he was optimistic that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services will approve the state's new plan, but if they don't it will be because "CMS does not want to see expanded Medicaid continue in Kentucky."

The study found that Medicaid enrollment continues to be the highest in Eastern Kentucky with 31 percent participation, followed by Western Kentucky at 26 percent participation.

It also notes that while levels of uncompensated care have dropped for both urban and rural hospitals since 2013, rural hospitals saw slight increases in uncompensated care in 2015. (SHADAC graphic)

For the full report, click here.

Thursday, 25 June 2015

Princess Health and Supreme Court upholds Obamacare subsides in all states; ruling has no direct effect on Kentucky, but focuses political debate.Princessiccia

By Molly Burchett
Kentucky Health News

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the tax subsidies provided under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act are legal in every state.

While the ruling has no effect on Kentucky, and would have had no direct effect if it had gone the other way, it sets the table for continued political debate about health policy in Congress and in Kentucky's race for governor.

"Congress passed the Affordable Care Act to improve health insurance markets, not to destroy them," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the 6-3 majority opinion. "If at all possible, we must interpret the Act in a way that is consistent with the former, and avoids the latter."

The law says the federal government can pay subsidies to help people afford insurance bought through �an Exchange established by the State.� The lawsuit argued that Americans in the 34 states using the federal exchanges were not eligible for the subsidies, which are crucial to the law's success, helping to make health insurance more affordable, reducing the number of uninsured Americans. Proponents of the law say not providing subsidies to individuals in those 34 states relying on the federal exchange would have upended the law, notes CNN.

President Obama called on critics to accept the law as permanent, saying after the ruling, "The Affordable Care Act is here to stay."

But Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., called Obamacare �a rolling disaster for the American people,� with a �multitude of broken promises, including the one that resulted in millions of Americans losing the coverage they had and wanted to keep. Today�s ruling won�t change the skyrocketing costs in premiums, deductibles, and co-pays that have hit the middle class so hard over the last few years.�

Maps: Percentage uninsured in 2012, above, and 2014, below
Obama countered, "The setbacks I remember clearly. But as the dust has settled, there can be no doubt that this law is working. It has changed, and in some cases saved, American lives. It set this country on a smarter, stronger course." He added, "The law has helped hold the price of health care to its slowest growth in 50 years" and "Nearly one in three Americans who was uninsured a few years ago is insured today. The uninsured rate in America is the lowest since we began to keep records."

A White House fact sheet noted that the law also expanded "access to preventive care, including immunizations, well-child visits, certain cancer screenings, and contraceptive services, with no additional out-of-pocket costs as well as no more annual caps on essential benefit coverage and new annual limits on out-of-pocket costs."

Since Kentucky established its own exchange, Kynect, for buying subsidized health insurance or signing up for Medicaid, the ruling may seem moot for Kentuckians. However, it establishes some of the facts for a health-care policy debate in the governor's race between Republican Matt Bevin and Democratic Attorney General Jack Conway.

The exchanges and the expansion of the federal-state Medicaid program are choices for the states, and Bevin has said that if elected he would shut down Kynect and end the Medicaid expansion, which has covered about 430,000 Kentuckians. The federal government is paying their entire cost through next year; in 2017 the state would start picking up a small share, rising to the law's limit of 10 percent in 2020.

Conway has acknowledged questions about whether the state can afford to pay its share, but to �say you�re going to kick a half a million people off of health insurance based on what we may or may not be able to afford in 2021 is irresponsible.� A Conway spokesman said he "appreciates the court's careful consideration of this case and agrees with today's decision," reports the Lexington Herald-Leader.

The Herald-Leader's Mary Meehan interviewed officials and experts for a package of questions and answers about the law and Kentucky. It is published at http://www.kentucky.com/2015/06/25/3917832_in-light-of-the-supreme-court.html.

Outgoing Gov. Steve Beshear, a Democrat who expanded Medicaid, said in a statement that the decision �reaffirms that, from the very start, we did the right thing for the more than 500,000 Kentuckians who have qualified for health-care coverage through Kynect since January 1, 2014.�

Susan Zepeda, president and CEO of the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky, said in a release, "While many have been awaiting this important decision, we must remember that much remains to be done to assure that all Kentuckians � and all Americans � have timely access to safe, effective and affordable quality care." Zepeda said Kentuckians continue to work on ways to improve and protect Kentuckians' health, such as reforming the way we pay for care and making health care cost and pricing more transparent.

"As people who have forgone care too long because of its expense now gain access to care, it will place a larger short-term burden on the health-care system, which approaches like these can help to address," said Zepeda. "The Affordable Care Act permits � and incentivizes � local health care innovation. We can and must shape Kentucky solutions to Kentucky�s health challenges."

Sunday, 21 June 2015

Princess Health and Kentucky is cracking down on Suboxone, a heroin substitute that has become a big part of the illegal trade in painkillers.Princessiccia

A drug that was supposed to help people get off heroin has "created a new cash-for-pills market and a street trade" that state officials are trying to stop, Mary Meehan reports for the Lexington Herald-Leader.

The drug is buprenorphine, the active ingredient in the brand-name drugs Suboxone and Subutex, which became more popular in 2012, when the state cracked down on "pill mills" that were freely handing out prescriptions for painkillers. "A lot of the pill mills morphed into facilities that dispense these prescriptions," Dr. John Langefeld, medical director for the state's Medicaid program, told Meehan.

Also, Meehan writes, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act required insurance plans to cover treatment for substance abuse, and "as more Medicaid patients and others got health-insurance coverage, more people obtained prescriptions for buprenorphine, Langefeld said. . . . According to a state report, one user obtained prescriptions from nine doctors."
Read more here: http://www.kentucky.com/2015/06/20/3910362_the-drug-that-was-supposed-to.html?rh=1#storylink=cpy
Read more here: http://www.kentucky.com/2015/06/20/3910362_the-drug-that-was-supposed-to.html?rh=1#storylink=cpy

Lexington Herald-Leader chart by Chris Ware from state data
Use of the drug in Kentucky "has increased 241 percent since 2012," Meehan reports. "And 80 percent of the prescriptions for it were being written by 20 percent of the state's 470 certified prescribers, said Dr. Allen Brenzel, medical director of the state's Department of Behavioral Health. . . . Since 2011, 10 doctors have been sanctioned by the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure because of problems prescribing Suboxone."

Suboxone is supposed to be taken in conjunction with therapy and drug testing. "a patient receives a controlled dose of a legal drug as the dose is tapered by a physician for a safe and effective withdrawal," Meehan notes. However, "doctors started to see Suboxone patients on a cash basis, asking for as much as $300 for an office visit that included a prescription for the maximum allowable amount of Suboxone. Patients often received no therapy or drug testing. Some patients were on the maximum dose indefinitely, Brenzel said." Some doctors prescribed the drug with other painkillers, creating an illegal market.

To prevent such abuse by unscrupulous doctors, the medical-licensure board has issued regulations that require "more physician education and the requirement that the drug be prescribed only for medically supervised withdrawal and not be given to pregnant women," Meehan writes. "Patients should also be closely monitored and drug tested. If those rules are not followed, a doctor can face sanctions or restrictions to his medical license."

Suboxone was in the national news recently because the accused killer in the Charleston, S.C., shootings was arrested for illegal possession of it four months ago at a South Carolina shopping mall, the Herald-Leader notes.
Read more here: http://www.kentucky.com/2015/06/20/3910362_the-drug-that-was-supposed-to.html?rh=1#storylink=cpy

Read more here: http://www.kentucky.com/2015/06/20/3910362_the-drug-that-was-supposed-to.html?rh=1#storylink=cpy

Friday, 5 June 2015

Princess Health and Citing costs, Bevin has said he would shut down Kynect; actually, insurance companies pay for it; Medicaid is another matter.Princessiccia

By Molly Burchett and Al Cross
Kentucky Health News

The governor's race between Democrat Jack Conway and Republican Matt Bevin will spotlight the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, an issue that affects all Kentuckians at least indirectly.

Conway, in his eighth year as attorney general, says he would have voted for the law. Bevin, who was the most conservative candidate in his primary, has said he would shut down the state's health-insurance exchange, Kynect, that was established under the law, because it will cost the state hundreds of millions of dollars.

Actually, Kynect is paid for by insurance companies that sell policies in Kentucky. Bevin appears to be referring to the projected cost of expanding Medicaid, another Obamacare-related move that Democratic Gov. Steve Beshear made at the same time he created Kynect. It raised the program's income limit to 138 percent of the federal poverty level, from 69 percent.

The federal government is paying the entire cost of the Medicaid expansion for the first three years. In 2017, the state will pay 3 percent, gradually rising to the law's cap of 10 percent in 2020. A study for the state projects that the expansion will pay for itself until 2021 by expanding health-care jobs and generating economic activity and tax revenue.

Bevin has scoffed at those projections. Conway has said the state needs to provide health coverage, but only what it can afford.

As Kentuckians, voters, and consumers of health insurance, you may be asking: What's going on with Obamacare in the state? Are we able to afford it? Who and what should we believe? While the cost of Medicaid expansion is debatable, it's becoming clear that Kynect has avoided the problems plaguing other state-run exchanges.

So far, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has dispensed more than $4.9 billion in grants to help launch state-run exchanges. Kentucky received $253 million for the initial planning and development phases of Kynect. Now its $28 million annual cost is covered by a fee on insurance companies, state officials say.

Despite federal support and their own revenue sources, many of the 17 state-based exchanges are expecting deficits this year and in the future. Many will continue to rely on leftover federal funds to pay for operations this year, report Darius Tahir and Paul Demko of Modern Healthcare. Hawaii announced this week that it would close its exchange and transfer clients to the federal exchange because of continued funding problems.
Kynect officials say it isn't having such problems because the state has ensured that Kynect is self-supporting through fees on insurance plans.

"The governor committed that the exchange would be self-supporting and would not rely on state General Fund dollars," said Jill Midkiff, spokeswoman for the Cabinet for Health and Family Services. "Kentucky�s sustainability plan employs an existing assessment on insurers that was previously used to fund Kentucky Access, the state�s high-risk pool, which was closed [since] individuals previously enrolled are now eligible to purchase a plan through Kynect."

But to transform Kentucky Access into Kynect, Beshear used executive orders that bypassed the General Assembly, where Republicans control the Senate. They have questioned his use of executive powers but generally have not been critical of Kynect.

The fee on insurers is a 1 percent, broad-based assessment on all policies sold by companies offering plans through the exchange. While insurers don't pass this fee directly to consumers, it almost certainly figures into their calculation of premium calculation and thus is indirectly paid by policyholders. The federal exchange is financed in a similar way, but its fee is 3.5 percent, meaning higher costs for insurers and policyholders.

In most cases, premiums for Kynect policies are reduced by a federal income-tax subsidy that is a key part of Obamacare.

"The vast majority of Kentuckians buying health insurance through Kynect are eligible for some kind of payment assistance or subsidy," Beshear said in commenting on most health-insurance companies recent requests for premium increases. "That cost will vary from family to family, so talking about rate changes in a vacuum isn�t a very effective way to gauge how much those rate fluctuations may affect policyholders or those shopping for insurance."

Bevin says he would move Kynect customers to the federal exchange, but the U.S. Supreme Court could rule this month that the tax subsidies are not supposed to be available through the federal exchange. The plaintiffs in the case cite a passage of the law that opponents say was a drafting error and does not make sense when the law is viewed as a whole.

If the court agrees with the plaintiffs, and Congress doesn't change the law, states using the federal exchanges will see spikes in insurance premiums, and millions of people could be at risk of losing their insurance. Bevin has not said what he would do in case of such a ruling.

Independent Drew Curtis is also running for governor.