Princess Health and Potent fentanyl, mixed with heroin, drives 14.7 percent increase in fatal drug overdoses in Kentucky from 2014 to 2015. Princessiccia

Princess Health and Potent fentanyl, mixed with heroin, drives 14.7 percent increase in fatal drug overdoses in Kentucky from 2014 to 2015. Princessiccia

drug abuse drugs narcotics prescription drug abuse state government

Gusty 09:15 Add Comment

The number of drug-overdose fatalities in Kentucky rose almost 15 percent in 2015, driven by a 247 percent jump in deaths involving fentanyl, a highly potent opioid that some traffickers are mixing with heroin, the Kentucky Office of Drug Control Policy said Tuesday.

The office counted 1,248 fatal overdoses in Kentucky last year, up 14.7 percent from the 1,088 reported in 2014. Fentanyl was a factor in more than a third: 420, up from 121.

"Heroin was detected in 28 percent of cases, consistent with the previous year," the Justice and Public Safety Cabinet said in a press release. "However, as a total, heroin-related deaths increased in 2015, largely because the drug is being laced with fentanyl."

�The introduction of illicit fentanyl into the heroin trade is producing devastating results,� Van Ingram, director of the office, said in the release. �Whether it�s manufactured to resemble heroin or a prescription pill, the cartels have made an already dangerous situation worse.�

Gov. Matt Bevin said, �I am heartbroken for the Commonwealth. More than three families a day are shattered by this epidemic of untimely death. This is unacceptable and will be vigorously addressed with every resource at our disposal.�

The report by Ingram's office listed the eight counties with the most fatal overdoses per person from 2012 to 2015. All were in Eastern Kentucky or Northern Kentucky. Here are the counties, with the number of deaths per 10,000 people: Leslie, 6.86; Bell, 6.12; Gallatin, 5.26; Knott, 4.87; Wolfe, 4.83; Floyd, 4.76; Campbell, 4.72 per 100,000 and Kenton, 4.63 per 10,000.

Counties with big percentage increases in fatal overdoses from 2014 to 2015 included Bell, from 11 to 20; Boyd, from 13 to 24; Butler, from none to eight; Harlan, from six to 10; Kenton, from 71 to 112; and Rowan, from five to 12.

Counties with large decreases included Bullitt, from 22 to 11; Grant, 13 to 6; Russell, from 13 to 7; Laurel, 18 to 10; Leslie, from nine to five; McCracken, 20 to 10; and Marshall, from 12 to fewer than five. The report does not list specific numbers for a county in years when the county had fewer than five fatal overdoses.

The figures above are based on where the death occurred. Based on the residence of the overdose victim, some counties ranked higher; for example, Powell County had 5.84 overdose deaths per 10,000 people, and Russell County had 4.95. This map shows rates based on the county where the overdose victims resided; note that it shows the death rate per 100,000 people, not 10,000 (a figure closer to the population of most counties). Click on the image for a larger version.

Princess Health and Health ranking of Kentucky seniors moves up, but they are still last in health outcomes, says America's Health Rankings. Princessiccia

Princess Health and Health ranking of Kentucky seniors moves up, but they are still last in health outcomes, says America's Health Rankings. Princessiccia

dental care exercise federal spending health rankings hospitals immunizations local government nursing homes obesity oral health physical activity poverty seniors state government vaccinations

Gusty 12:57 Add Comment

By Melissa Patrick and Al Cross
Kentucky Health News

Kentucky moved up three spots, from 48th to 45th, in the fourth annual Senior America's Health Rankings Report. But the state ranked last in health outcomes and 44th in determiners of those outcomes, so it remains one of the least healthy places in the nation for seniors to live.

Among negative measures, Kentucky seniors ranked first in preventable hospitalizations, second in tooth extractions and premature death; and third in physical inactivity and hospital re-admissions within 30 days of discharge.

Among positive measures, the state also ranked poorly: for example, 46th in the percentage (34%) of seniors who reported that their health status was good or excellent and 48th in the percentage (56.9%) who reported having no disability.

The state's best ranking was No. 3 in influenza vaccinations, reflecting an increase to 70 percent from 62 percent of seniors vaccinated in the past two years. It was No. 8 in the percentage of seniors with arthritis who self-report arthritis or joint pain does not limit their usual activities. It tied for 10th in the percentage of seniors with a "creditable prescription-drug plan" and was 17th in the percentage of senior who reported having a mammogram or a colonoscopy or similar screening.

Kentucky ranked low in volunteer activity by seniors (45th) and nursing home quality (43rd) but has fewer people in nursing homes who perhaps shouldn't be there. Only 7 percent of its nursing-home residents, the No. 7 ranking, were considered "low care" and thus candidates for living in less restrictive environments. However, it was 46th in the number of personal-care and home-health aides per 1,000 adults aged 75 or older.

The state tied for 44th in the percentage (32.1) of seniors who reported falling in the previous 12 months. It was 44th in the percentage (42.8) of seniors who were enrolled in hospice during the last six months of life after being diagnosed with a condition that carried high probability of death.

It was also 44th in a related measure, the percentage (16.6) of seniors who spent seven or more days in an intensive- or critical-care unit during their last six months. Generally, use of an ICU correlates with the number of ICU beds, which "could indicate a supply-induced remand," the report says. "Overusing the critical care system often goes against the wishes of dying patients and is costly. Research indicates many patients receive care they would not choose in their final days."

The rankings are based on 35 measures of health, as well as supplemental measures such as education and mental health. Combined, they paint a picture of how individual behavior, our communities and their environments, health policy and access to care influence health.

One area that Kentucky consistently ranks low in is government support for seniors in poverty. It was 45th again this year, spending $382 per senior when federal, state and local funds were all counted. Massachusetts, which ranked first in overall senior health this year, spends $4,053 per senior in this category, more than any other state but Alaska, which has many rural elderly. The national average, which has been declining, is $811.

Kentucky leads the nation in smoking, so it's no surprise that its seniors also rank in the bottom five states for this negative category (47th). Kentucky seniors' smoking rate is 12.4 percent; the national average is 8.8 percent. Both have declined about 40 percent in the last 15 years.

Smoking is the leading cause of preventable death in the United States," says the report. "Cessation, even in older smokers, can have profound benefits on current health status as well as improve long-term outcomes."

Kentucky was fifth from the bottom in dental visits by seniors, but the good news is that the share of seniors having such visits rose to 57 percent from 53 percent last year.

"Poor oral health is associated with such chronic diseases as diabetes and cardiovascular disease, and can have a large impact on quality of life resulting in pain and affecting the ability to chew or speak," says the report.

Kentucky improved its senior obesity ranking, another negative measurement, to 24th from 41st. About two out of every seven Kentucky seniors are obese, or 27.5 percent, the same as the national average. Last year the rate was 29.6 percent.

"Obese seniors experience more hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and use of outpatient health services than non-obese seniors, leading to higher health care costs," says the report. "Physical activity, healthy diet, supportive communities and social networks, and an environment that encourages exercise all play a role in reducing obesity in older adults."

The report says that between 1999 and 2014, Kentucky's middle-aged population (50-64) saw a 34 percent increase in in obesity and a 68 percent increase in diabetes. These findings were similar across the nation.

The report says Kentucky's senior population is expected to increase 44 percent by 2030. "Over the next 15 years, the health of this population will be challenged by large numbers of new people becoming seniors and the additional health challenges, such as diabetes, that this groups brings with them," it says."These higher rates of diabetes and obesity are expected to put significant strains on the Medicare program and the overall health-care system."

The report, sponsored by the United Health Foundation, is a call to action for states, offering specific benchmarks that can be changed to improve health.

Louisiana again ranked last for overall senior health, followed by Oklahoma. Kentucky, West Virginia, Arkansas and Mississippi had similar scores. The top six states for overall senior health are Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire, Minnesota, Hawaii and Utah. Click here for the full report. (Click on chart for another version that may be clearer)

Princess Health and Kynectors, health advocates ask state to maintain staffing and other resources in new health-insurance enrollment system. Princessiccia

Princess Health and Kynectors, health advocates ask state to maintain staffing and other resources in new health-insurance enrollment system. Princessiccia

health insurance Kynect Medicaid obamacare state government

Gusty 16:00 Add Comment

As the administration of Gov. Matt Bevin works toward dismantling Kynect, the state's health insurance exchange, health advocates say they worry that the transition is going too quickly to be smooth, risking a loss of coverage for some Kentuckians.

Kentucky Voices for Health, a coalition of groups supporting health-care reform, said June 9 that the administration needs to "keep, hire and train adequate staff," make eligibility decisions quickly, "dedicate enough resources to educate the public on how to enroll," publish its plan and allow time for comment, and "create an online dashboard to measure how well the system is functioning."

The group also wants the administration to extend the transition period, saying that no state has made such a transition so quickly.

�To be successful, we need to take our time and make absolutely sure we�re protecting consumers from gaps in coverage," KVH Executive Director Emily Beauregard said. "By . . . taking more time to complete the transition, Kentucky can keep more of its people covered with access to essential care."

Whitney Allen, coordinator of community development and outreach for the Kentucky Primary Care Association, said in the KVH news release, �These recommendations are key to fostering a culture of continuous improvement focused on the consumer experience.�

Keeping a campaign promise, Bevin decided to shift Kentuckians enrolling in private, federally subsidized health insurance via Kynect to the federal exchange, www.healthcare.gov, and Medicaid recipients to Benefind, the state's new one-stop website for state benefits, by Nov. 1.

This new model for subsidized insurance is a federally supported but state-based marketplace, in which the federal government will handle consumers' eligibility appeals but the state will handle insurance-company grievances and still review insurance plans. The federal government will certify the plans but it will "strongly rely" on state recommendations, Health Secretary Vickie Glisson said in March. Consumer grievances will be handled by a state-federal partnership.

Kentucky Voices for Health said it wants "to ensure that any enrollment system that will replace Kynect works as well or better to ensure all Kentuckians have access to coverage without interruption or barriers."

Bevin's office replied to the KVH release with this statement: "Throughout the process, we have updated stakeholders and listened to their feedback. We appreciate the continued interest, input and cooperation of advocates as they are an important component of our communications and outreach strategy during the transition from Kynect to healthcare.gov. We are pleased to report that Kentucky has met all milestones and deliverables, some ahead of schedule, that were established by the [federal] team in order to proceed with the transition to healthcare.gov."

KVH continued to emphasize the importance of Kynectors, a blanket term used for those who help Kentuckians apply for and enroll in coverage. The state has about 600 Kynectors, but their fate is uncertain.

�Research indicates that Kentucky consumers find insurance overwhelming and confusing, and value the face-to-face assistance they have received to navigate the system,� Dr. Susan Buchino of the Commonwealth Institute of Kentucky, said in the KVH release. The institute, part of the University of Louisville School of Public Health and Information Sciences, calls itself a "transdisciplinary collaborative for population health improvement, policy and analytics."

KVH said the Bevin administration recently agreed to its request to have a diverse, multi-stakeholder advisory committee like the one that helped create Kynect.

The group said its recommendations came from Kynectors and health advocates, "many of whom have hands-on experience with enrollment and consumer assistance." Click here for the full report.

Forbes magazine contributor Josh Archambault wrote June 7 that Bevin is right to end Kynect because it serves mainly as a funnel to the Medicaid program and is funded by a fee on all health-insurance policies sold in Kentucky.

At least part of the fee will remain in place to help pay transition costs, fund the Kentucky Health Information Exchange and cover remaining claims to the high-risk insurance pool for which the fee was originally established. It was transformed into Kynect funding by an executive order from then-Gov. Steve Beshear.

"Kynect�s website will actually be active until the end of 2017, as the site also services small-business plans which have no set open-enrollment season," Archambault notes.

Princess Health and State Medicaid boss says program won't charge premiums but may have fewer benefits; Bevin's office says all is still on the table. Princessiccia

Princess Health and State Medicaid boss says program won't charge premiums but may have fewer benefits; Bevin's office says all is still on the table. Princessiccia

governor health insurance health reform Medicaid obamacare politics state budget state government

Gusty 19:05 Add Comment

The state's revised Medicaid program won't require any beneficiaries to pay premiums, but it may offer fewer benefits, Medicaid Commissioner Stephen Miller told Adam Beam of The Associated Press.

But Gov. Matt Bevin's office told Beam that Miller's comments were preliminary: "Everything is on the table and no decisions have been finalized," spokeswoman Jessica Ditto told him.

Bevin has said Medicaid recipients should have some "skin in the game" and has pointed to Indiana, which received a federal waiver allowing it to charge premiums based on income levels to people who want benefits beyond the basic Medicaid program.

The idea drew strong opposition from health-care providers, consumer advocates, public-health professionals and representatives of higher education in a May 12 meeting, according to the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky, which convened the gathering.

"Miller said negotiations with officials at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, a division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, indicate they will not approve a plan that requires Kentucky's expanded Medicaid population to pay for a portion of their health insurance," Beam reports.

Miller told him, "That, today, is not part of the plan. That is something that's going to be a tough sell."

Bevin is seeking changes that will save the state money. Starting Jan. 1, it will have to pay 5 percent of the costs of those who have joined Medicaid under the expanded eligibility created by the federal health-reform law. Its share will rise in annual steps to the law's limit of 10 percent in 2020. The state's expected bill for 2017 and the first half of 2018 is $257 million.

Now it seems that savings are likely to come by cutting benefits. "Miller said some Medicaid recipients could see fewer benefits under the new plan," Beam reports. "He said the health insurance plan for the state's Medicaid recipients is better than the basic plan offered to state employees. He said the new plan will likely bring the Medicaid plan more in line with the health plan offered to state workers." Miller said, "That would be a reduction in some benefit levels, such as in vision, dental."

Also, Miller said the program could encourage healthier behaviors by funding health savings accounts if they did such things as participating in smoking-cessation and weight-loss programs. "It may sound like we are rewarding them for that, but the long-term effect is it makes their health care coverage less expensive,"  Miller told Beam.

He said the state hopes to submit its waiver application in September. HHS spokesman Ben Wakana, told Beam that any changes "should maintain or build on the historic improvements Kentucky has seen in access to coverage, access to care, and financial security." Before the expansion; 20 percent of Kentuckians had no health coverage; now the figure is 7.5 percent.

Princess Health and Study says if Ky. cut its smoking rate to the national average, it could save $1.7 billion in health-care costs the very next year . Princessiccia

Princess Health and Study says if Ky. cut its smoking rate to the national average, it could save $1.7 billion in health-care costs the very next year . Princessiccia

health care costs local government research smokeless tobacco smoking ban smoking bans smoking cessation smoking ordinances state government tobacco prevention

Gusty 14:50 Add Comment

Illustration from University of California-San Francisco

By Melissa Patrick
Kentucky Health News

If Kentucky could cut its smoking rate to the national average, it would save an estimated $1.7 billion on healthcare the following year, a study says.

Kentucky's smoking rate is 26 percent, and the national average is 18 percent.

The study at the University of California-San Francisco estimates that a 10 percent decline in the national rate would save $63 billion the next year in health-care costs.

"What it adds to our knowledge is that we can save money quickly," Ellen Hahn, University of Kentucky nursing professor and director of its smoke-free policy center, told Kentucky Health News. "We are not talking 18 to 20 years down the road. ... If we reduced our smoking rate at least 10 percent, we would see dramatic reductions in health-care cost in just one year."

The study also found that smoking makes Kentucky spend $399 more per person per year on health care than it would if the state's rate equaled the national rate. That was the highest figure of any state.

Conversely, low rates of smoking save Utah and California, respectively, $465 and $416 per person per year compared to what they would spend if their smoking rates were the national rate.

�Regions that have implemented public policies to reduce smoking have substantially lower medical costs,� the study's authors said in a news release. �Likewise, those that have failed to implement tobacco control policies have higher medical costs.�

Lexington's smoking rates dropped 32 percent in just one year after it enacted its smoking ban, which amounted to an estimated $21 million in smoking-related healthcare costs savings, according to a University of Kentucky study led by Hahn and published in the journal Preventive Medicine.

The UCSF study, published in PLOS Medicine, looked at health-care spending in each state and the District of Columbia from 1992 to 2009, and measured the year-to-year relationship between changes in smoking behavior and changes in medical costs.

Many studies have shown that smoking bans and other smoke-free policies decrease smoking rates, reduce smoking prevalence among workers and the general population, and keep youth from starting to smoke.

These have been some of the arguments for a statewide smoking ban, but efforts to pass one have stalled because new Republican Gov. Matt Bevin opposes a statewide ban and says smoke-free policies should be a local decision.

Bevin won big budget cuts from the legislature to set aside hundreds of millions of dollars for shoring up the state's pension systems, but the study hasn't made the administration look at a smoking ban as a source of savings. A ban passed the House last year but died in the Senate.

Asked how this study might affect the administration's position on a statewide smoking ban, Doug Hogan, acting communications director for the Cabinet for Health and Family Services, said in an e-mail, "Smoking bans are a local issue, rather than a one-size-fits-all solution." Bevin's office and Senate President Robert Stivers did not respond to requests for comment.

Hogan said the cabinet is committed to helping people quit smoking: "Education and proper policy incentives are critical tools that the state can use and as our commonwealth crafts its Medicaid wavier, it is looking very closely at ways to best incentivize smoking cessation to improve health and decrease cost to the commonwealth."

Dr. Ellen Hahn

Hahn said, "Kentucky has the dubious honor of leading the nation in cigarette smoking, and we have for many years. ... it is a major driver of health-care cost. And in a climate where we are trying to save every dollar ... I think that we should pay attention to this study because what it really says is that we can save a boatload of money if we help people quit and we can save it quickly."

Other possible tobacco-control measures include raising cigarette taxes, anti-smoking advertising campaigns and better access to smoking-cessation programs. Hahn said the state gets some money from the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the tobacco master settlement agreement for prevention and cessation efforts, but the state needs to do more.

"We spend very little on the things that we know work, like helping people quit smoking, like doing widespread media campaigns on television, radio and print," she said. "We just don't do that in our state. We never have. In fact, we spend very little, about 8 percent of what the CDC say we should."

The study says significant health-care savings could occur so quickly because the risks for smoke-related diseases decreases rapidly once a smoker quits.

"For example, the risk of heart attack and stroke drop by approximately half in the first year after the smoker quits, and the risk of having a low-birth-weight infant due to smoking almost entirely disappears if a pregnant woman quits smoking during the first trimester," says the report.

"These findings show that state and national policies that reduce smoking not only will improve health, but can be a key part of health care cost containment even in the short run," co-author Stanton Glantz, director of the UCSF Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, said in the release.

Hahn said, "People don't realize how effective quitting smoking really is, how much money it really saves. So that is the value of this paper. It is a wake-up call for those of us doing this tobacco control work and for elected officials who are trying to save money and redirect funds and shore up the economic health of Kentucky. ... Doing all we can to reduce smoking saves lives and money. What's better than that?"

Princess Health and Medicaid stakeholders OK with healthy behavior incentives, oppose penalizing recipients who don't take part in cost sharing. Princessiccia

Princess Health and Medicaid stakeholders OK with healthy behavior incentives, oppose penalizing recipients who don't take part in cost sharing. Princessiccia

federal spending health care costs health insurance insurance coverage managed care Medicaid obamacare Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act state government

Gusty 13:11 Add Comment

By Melissa Patrick and Al Cross
Kentucky Health News

Groups of people concerned about changes in Kentucky's Medicaid program are open to the state offering incentives for healthy behaviors, but they don't want to penalize recipients who can't or won't pay premiums, deductibles or co-payments.

So reports the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky, which convened a meeting May 12 to hear from people with stakes in the program: individual health-care providers, health systems, consumers, consumer advocates, payers, public-health professionals and representatives of higher education.

�Participants were unified in opposing penalties to enforce cost-sharing provisions� such as premiums, deductibles or co-payments, the foundation's consultant said in a report on the meeting.

However, they supported cost sharing for procedures not deemed medically necessary and �had diverse perspectives on this matter, ranging from opposing any cost-sharing in Medicaid to proposing specific premium and co-payment amounts,� such as $5 monthly premiums.

Also, �Participants were generally very supportive of implementing incentives for healthy behaviors such as smoking cessation and health risk assessments,� the report said. �Incentives might be reductions in the amount of cost-sharing or themselves supportive of healthy behavior,� such as gym membership.

Gov. Matt Bevin has said he wants Medicaid recipients to have "skin in the game" through cost-sharing, arguing that Kentucky can't afford to have more than a fourth of its population getting free medical care.

Under federal health reform, then-Gov, Steve Beshear expanded Medicaid eligibility to households with incomes up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level, adding more than 400,000 more people to the rolls. The federal government pays for the expansion through this year, but next year the state will be responsible for 5 percent, rising in annual steps to the reform law's limit of 10 percent in 2020.

Bevin's administration is working on getting a waiver from the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to create new ways to cover those in the expansion. Six states have such waivers, including Indiana, which Bevin has cited as an example of how Kentucky might change its program.

In Indiana, recipients who pay premiums based on income levels, ranging from $1 a month to 2 percent of income ($27 a month for those at 138 percent of poverty) get expanded benefits and are charged co-payments only for non-emergency use of emergency rooms, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. Those above the poverty level who fail to pay are disenrolled and barred from re-enrolling for six months, in what is known as a "lock-out" rule.

Bevin has indicated that he wants to announce his plan this summer. By law, states that seek a waiver must hold at least two public hearings: one at least 20 days before submitting the application to CMS, and the second after CMS accepts the application.

Stakeholders who attended the foundation's May 12 convening wanted to make sure their voices were heard early on in the process.

"Our goal is to help inform the process of changing the way Kentucky provides Medicaid services to ensure that we maintain the gains achieved under the Affordable Care Act, while also enabling the state to try new methods of ensuring access to affordable quality health care for Medicaid beneficiaries," Foundation President and CEO Susan Zepeda said in a news release.

"The biggest takeaway for me was the energy and commitment in the room," Zepeda said in a telephone interview. "A lot of thoughtfulness clearly went into sharing their experience and making suggestions on how to make the system more cost effective."

Before breaking into groups to offer their imput, stakeholders were given an overview of the state's Medicaid expansion and an overview of an issue brief created by the State Health Access Data Assistance Center at the University of Minnesota that looked at how waiver provisions are set up in five other states. Foundation staff wrote the 25-page "Stakeholder Input Report" that summarized suggestions and concerns and broke them into eight areas:

Cost-sharing and penalties: Health-care providers strongly opposed any cost-sharing, and uniformly opposed to any measure that involved "lock-out" penalties for failure to pay premiums, co-pays or deductibles.

"Our shared experience has been that we�ve been prohibited from denying care if a patient refuses or is unable to pay," the Physical and Oral Health Provider group said. "Therefore, the desired behavior isn�t actually enforced."

The Behavioral Health Provider group offered a compromise: �If the administration chooses to explore lock-outs we recommend that lock-outs be immediately lifted (upon payment) and payment be retroactive to the date the consumer re-enrolls.�

Participants in general were open to the idea of low co-payments, cost-sharing for non-medically necessary services, using Medicaid dollars to pay premiums for employer-sponsored insurance plans and charging co-payments for non-emergency use of the ER. They also agreed that certain groups, like those with chronic illnesses or disabilities, should be exempted.

Incentives: Most post-ACA waiver programs have implemented incentives for healthy behavior, and those at the meeting generally supported implementing evidence-based incentives, such as smoking cessation and health-risk assessments.

Zepeda said that most of the stakeholders wanted to see healthy behavior incentives used as credits against premiums, especially for recipients who can't afford them. "There is a recognition that people have a role to play in their own health care and the health decisions that they make," she said.

Benefits: Benefits include services covered under the health insurance plan. Some participants opposed any changes to current benefits; others wanted to expand existing benefits and still others suggested adding new benefits like housing. All agreed that medically necessary services should be covered for all enrollees.

Reimbursement: Kentucky shifted Medicaid in 2011 to managed care, in which managed-care organizations (usually insurance-company subsidiaries) are paid a flat fee per person as an incentive to limit claims. Providers have complained about the slow and low reimbursement, and participant suggestions included streamlining and accelerating the reimbursement process, increasing provider reimbursement rates, and adding new categories of reimbursed services and providers, like telehealth.

Systems improvement: Participants suggested simplifying administrative processes for providers; expanding providers' scope of practice; adding review panels; reducing the number of managed-care organizations; and creating a single list of drugs for all MCOs.

Health system transformation: Waivers allow states to explore ways to provide care differently through various transformation approaches. Suggestions included creating price transparency, through an all-payer, all-claims database; improving consumer health literacy; and moving beyond coverage issues to addressing access and quality.

�There was also interest among our group in examining a PCMH (patient-centered medical home) or health homes model to promote care coordination, and we feel strongly that pharmacists are essential part of the team and should be used in novel and more expansive ways,� the Colleges and Universities group said.

Evaluation: Waivers require states to perform an evaluation and make it public. Participants agreed that the process should include stakeholders and that findings should be made public periodically.

The Physical and Oral Health Provider group suggested the evaluation should answer the questions, �Have we maintained coverage levels? Have we improved access to care?�

Overarching themes: Many of the stakeholders mentioned two issues that were not included in the issue brief or discussion: integrating behavioral, physical and oral health services, and addressing the wide set of social factors that shape Kentucky's relatively poor health.

�Waivers should include methods to address social determinants of health as these areas are proving most effective in improving outcomes and reducing cost,� the Physical and Oral Health Provider group said. �We encourage inclusion of community health workers, peer support, medical respite care and other innovations to support social needs of patients.�

Zepeda said the Medicaid waiver drafting team faces many challenges. "We consider the rich conversation that happened on May 12 to be the start of the conversation," she said. "We have to find the cost effective win/win strategies that can reduce the cost of Medicaid going forward and let us continue to serve this expanded number of Kentuckians who now have health insurance."

Princess Health and Kentucky is the only truly Appalachian state to have put a brake on fatal overdoses from narcotics. Princessiccia

Princess Health and Kentucky is the only truly Appalachian state to have put a brake on fatal overdoses from narcotics. Princessiccia

Appalachia doctors drug abuse drugs General Assembly legislature narcotics pain pain clinics physicians prescription drug abuse prescription drugs state government

Gusty 12:08 Add Comment

Kentucky is the only truly Appalachian state to have put a brake on fatal drug overdoses, report Rich Lord and Adam Smeltz of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette as part of a series in the about the deadly epidemic of prescription painkillers in the region.

A chart with the series' story about Kentucky shows that fatal drug overdoses were less numerous in the state in 2013 than in 2012, when the General Assembly cracked down on "pill mills," and that while fatal overdoses rose in 2014, they were still not as numerous as in 2012. Official numbers for 2015 are expected soon, and may rise because of the spread of heroin.

The series also credited a crackdown by the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure, which "took disciplinary action for prescribing irregularities against 135 of the state�s roughly 10,600 doctors" from 2011 to 2015. "The board also moved against 33 doctors during that time for abusing narcotics themselves."

"Getting tough on doctors works," Lord wrote in the series' main story. The state story reported, "Kentucky�s per-capita opioid consumption -- though still seventh in the nation -- dropped by a steepest-in-Appalachia 12.5 percent from 2012 to 2014, according to IMS Health Inc.," Lord and Smeltz report. "Kentucky is the only state, among the seven studied by the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, in which fatal overdoses have plateaued. Elsewhere, they have climbed relentlessly."

The story quotes Kerry B. Harvey, U.S. attorney for the eastern half of Kentucky: �In much of Eastern Kentucky, the workforce is engaged in difficult, manual labor,� like mining, farming and logging, �so people would injure themselves and be prescribed these very potent narcotics, because the medical profession changed the way it looked at prescribing these kinds of narcotics for pain.� The drugs dulled the �sense of hopelessness� people had about the area�s economy, �and so for whatever reason, this sort of culture of addiction took hold.�

"Harvey said that as physicians have gone to jail, and others have faced board discipline, the painkiller business model has adapted. . . . Now the doctors take insurance, and bill the insurer or the government not just for the office visit, but for the MRI, urine screen and back brace they use to justify the addictive narcotic." Harvey said, �So instead of a cash business, in many cases now the taxpayers or the insurance companies pay. The result is the same. We end up with our communities flooded with these very potent prescription narcotics.�