Thursday, 4 June 2015

Princess Health and Bourbon Co. teen named South's top youth anti-tobacco advocate for his efforts in pushing for county smoking ban.Princessiccia

Tyler Boyle (Photo from
Lexington Herald-Leader)
Tyler Boyle, a Bourbon County High School senior and president of Students Making A Change in the Community, was named the South Region Youth Advocate of the Year by the Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids for his efforts to push a smoking ban in Bourbon County, Lashana Harney reports for the Lexington Herald-Leader.

Boyle has been a part of SMACC since it was re-established in 2013. The club is a place for youth voices to be heard on smoking issues, with the ultimate goal of a countywide smoking ban -- but in the meantime, working for a school regulation that would ban electronic cigarettes.

The smoking ban has yet to pass, but the schools have added e-cigarettes to their comprehensive tobacco policy, which banned tobacco products of any kind on school grounds.

Boyle told the Herald-Leader that he applied for the award in hopes of bringing more attention to the anti-tobacco cause in his county, which has a long history of tobacco production and sales.

"I applied for this award because of all of the work that I've done in my home community and state for tobacco control," he told Harney. "I thought that if I could make national attention, maybe, it would make the officials in my community take this issue more seriously."

Boyle said that he was honored to receive the award, which was presented at a gala in Washington, D.C., in mid-May. He plans to attend a symposium sponsored by the Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids in Washington in July and the Philip Morris Cos. international shareholder meeting next May.

Boyle told Harney that sometimes he gets frustrated because change is slow to take place, but the will to keep pushing forward always comes back.

"After attending the award gala, I was revitalized and I'm ready for the next step in tobacco control," he said.

Boyle will attend Vassar College in the fall to study political science with a focus on advocacy work and said he would continue his work with the Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids.

"Tobacco advocacy is something near to my heart," Boyle said. "Vassar is actually going smoke free in July 2015. So, I plan to work hard to implement and support their new policy."

Princess Health and Insulin Resistance Predicts a Variety of Age-related Diseases. Princessiccia

Princess Health and Insulin Resistance Predicts a Variety of Age-related Diseases. Princessiccia

In the last post, I reviewed a study by Gerald Reaven's group showing that insulin resistance strongly predicts the risk of cardiovascular disease over a 5-year period. In 2001, Reaven's group published an even more striking follow-up result from the same cohort (1). This study shows that not only does insulin resistance predict cardiovascular disease risk, it also predicts a variety of age-related diseases, including hypertension, coronary heart disease, stroke, cancer, type 2 diabetes, and even overall mortality risk.

Read more �

Princess Health and Summer is a good time to make sure your teenagers or preteens get their four recommended vaccinations.Princessiccia

Vaccines aren't just for babies. Preteens and teens also fall into an age group that has both required immunizations for school and recommended vaccines that can save their lives.

Summer is a great time to take care of getting caught up on these vaccinations, because many pre-teens and teens see their primary-care provider anyway for sport and camp physicals. Taking care of them in the summer also helps to miss the back-to-school rush that typically happens as August approaches.

Four vaccines are recommended for preteens and teens, according to the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The flu vaccine is recommended yearly for teens, but three less familiar vaccines and boosters are also recommended. Also, it is recommended that during a vaccination visit, you make sure your child is up to date on all of the vaccinations they should have received when they were younger.
Click here more details.
The CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Family Physicians and other medical societies recommend these vaccines:

Meningococcal vaccine: This vaccine protects against some of the bacteria that causes meningitis and sepsis, which are very serious and sometimes fatal. It is recommended at 11 or 12 years old and a booster shot is recommended at age 16. Even if your child got the meningococcal vaccine at 12, 14 or 15, the booster is recommended. Older teens who haven't gotten this vaccine should get one as soon as possible.

HPV vaccine: This vaccine protects against the many cancers caused by the human papillomavirus, including cervical cancer in girls, and anal cancer and genital warts in both girls and boys. HPV vaccines are given in a three-dose series that should be started and finished when the boy or girl is 11 and 12. Pre-teens and teens who have not gotten this vaccine series should ask their primary care provider about getting them.

TDAP vaccine: This vaccine protects against three serious diseases: tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis, which is commonly called whooping cough. Preteens should get Tdap at 11 or 12. If your teenager didn't get a TDAP shot as a preteen, he or she should get it as soon as possible. This vaccine takes the place of what used to be called the tetanus booster.

Flu vaccine: Preteens and teens should get the flu vaccine every year as soon as it's available, usually in the fall. It is especially important for preteens and teens with chronic conditions like asthma or diabetes to get the flu shot.

"The vaccines for preteens are very safe," says the CDC. Side effects for these vaccines are usually mild and include redness and soreness at the site of the injection, or fainting from the medical procedure.

"Most side effects from vaccines are very minor, especially compared with the serious diseases that these vaccines prevent," says the CDC.

If you don't have insurance or if your plan does not cover vaccines, the Vaccines for Children Program provides vaccines for children ages 18 and younger, who are not insured or are under-insured. Vaccinations are covered on all plans purchased through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

Wednesday, 3 June 2015

Princess Health and Most insured through Kynect will pay more in 2016; Kentucky Health Cooperative seeks 25 percent increase.Princessiccia

Princess Health and Most insured through Kynect will pay more in 2016; Kentucky Health Cooperative seeks 25 percent increase.Princessiccia

By Molly Burchett
Kentucky Health News

The federal health law requires that insurers planning to significantly increase premiums for policies on a health-insurance exchange to submit their rates by June 1 for review. Many insurance carriers across the country, including four in Kentucky, are requesting double-digit increases in insurance premiums for 2016.

For the individual market, the requested average rates from companies already participating in the Kynect exchange are:
  • Anthem Health Plans, 14.6 percent increase;
  • CareSource Kentucky, 11.8 percent increase;
  • Humana Inc., 5.2 percent increase;
  • Kentucky Health Cooperative, 25.1 percent increase;
  • WellCare Health Plans, a 9.28 percent decrease.
The rates are not final, but are subject to approval by the state Department of Insurance, "so we don�t yet know what the final numbers will be," Gov. Steve Beshear said. "Changes still may occur. Rates should be finalized sometime in mid-July. We do expect that some plan rates will go down, some will go up and some will stay close to the same as last year."

Consumers will have more choices when enrollment opens, because the exchange is adding three new insurers to its individual market. United Healthcare will be offering coverage statewide, Aetna policies will be available in 10 counties, and Baptist Health Plan, now Bluegrass Family Health, will offer coverage in 79 counties. CareSource will expand its coverage area from 16 to 67 counties.

With these additions, at least three insurers will be offering Kynect coverage in every county, said Ronda Sloan of the Department of Insurance.

"When open enrollment begins this fall, Kentuckians should seek information about their individual plans, not average costs," Beshear said. "System-wide averages don�t give a good picture of what an individual�s out-of-pocket costs may be."

It is also important to keep in mind that premiums cannot be viewed in isolation, and you should look at the individual market dynamics that impact how much consumers pay for their health care coverage.

Why are most rates going up?

For an insurance company to survive, its cost of providing benefits should be less than the premiumums paid for those benefits. Companies now have had more than a full year of claims data to inform pricing structures, and many insurers are finding that people who buy policies on exchanges are considerably older and sicker than anticipated, reports Megan McArdle of Bloomberg News.

As a result, insurers are incurring greater costs of providing benefits than expected. Initially, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said that about 40 percent of the exchange policies should be bought by people between 18 and 35, the most healthy age group, to keep the exchanges financially stable. However, according to HHS data, that group accounted for only 28 percent of the policies in 2014 and 2015.

Not only do older people have more complex and more costly health needs, rising premiums in some state-based exchanges are due in part to the uncertainty in the overall health-insurance marketplace. First, there is much uncertainly about the reform law's "risk corridor program," which was designed to have insurers share the financial risk of offering policies on Obamacare exchanges from 2014 through 2016.

The program creates a pool of money to reduce risk for insurers: Those that pay out less in benefits than they collect in premiums pay into the pool; those whose premiums don't cover the cost of providing benefits take money from the pool. However, a recent Standard & Poor's report says the risk corridor will probably not get enough money from insurers with profitable exchange plans, so many insurers must raise premiums to support themselves.

Kentucky Health Cooperative needs shoring up

In another potentially worrisome sign, some insurers had risk-corridor receivables that exceeded half of their reported capital, and Kentucky Health Cooperative had the second-highest level of receivables as a percentage of capital: 117 percent, reports CNBC. That helps explain why it has asked for the largest average increase in premiums this year, 25 percent, and last year, 20 percent. The cooperative is one of several start-ups funded by the reform law to encourage competition in states; it sells most of the 106,000 private policies on Kynect.

Other reasons for the overall premium increases include rising health-care costs, especially for prescription drugs, Larry Levitt, senior vice president of the Kaiser Family Foundation, said on "PBS NewsHour" Wednesday night.

Speaking nationally, Levitt said state regulation means the requested premiums "will come down, in some cases by a lot." He said "Insurers are jockeying for position in these new marketplaces [so] there are some good deals to be had, but consumers really have to look around,"

David Blumenthal, president of The Commonwealth Fund, which researches health and social policy, said exchanges like Kynect "give people the ability to comparison-shop much more easily than before."
Princess Health and Even nicotine-free electronic cigarettes can damage lungs; parents urged to warn teens about dangers of e-cig smoking.Princessiccia

Princess Health and Even nicotine-free electronic cigarettes can damage lungs; parents urged to warn teens about dangers of e-cig smoking.Princessiccia

Kentucky has one of the nation's highest smoking rates, but electronic cigarettes, or e-cigs, are becoming more popular. These battery-powered vaporizers produce a vapor that usually does not contain nicotine. Some have claimed that e-cigs can help people quit smoking because the amount of nicotine can be reduced until it isn't present in the vapor. However, new research shows that other substances in e-cigs may damage the lungs.

Research has found that nicotine in any form damages the endothelial cells that line the lungs, and can cause them to become inflamed or injured. The new research has found that e-cigarette solutions without nicotine contain other substances like acrolein, which damage the lungs in other ways.

"This research reports that components found in commercially available e-cigarette solutions and vapors generated by heating them may cause lung inflammation," said lead researcher Irina Petrache. Long-term effects haven't yet been studied, but the results of this study warn that e-cig inhalation may involve adverse effects on lung health, she said.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention research shows that e-cigarette use among middle and high school students has tripled. "The development and marketing of e-cigarettes has the potential of hooking a whole new generation on nicotine," Garry Sigman, director of the Loyola University Health System Adolescent Medicine Program, said. It's very addictive and can lead to health issues such as lung disease, heart disease, hypertension and nervous system problems, he said.

Sigman said parents need to made sure their children understand that e-cigarettes are just as addictive as other substances. "Nicotine is so addictive that with only a few inhales, it can create an addiction," he said. Because adolescents enjoy and use technology so much, the modern qualities of the e-cigs might make them seem cool. "Setting rules and monitoring behavior is essential to keeping our teens safe," Sigman said.

Tuesday, 2 June 2015

Princess Health and Say It Ain't So, Again - a "Push Poll" to Minimize the Hazards of Conflicts of Interest ...in the New England Journal of Medicine?. Princessiccia

Princess Health and Say It Ain't So, Again - a "Push Poll" to Minimize the Hazards of Conflicts of Interest ...in the New England Journal of Medicine?. Princessiccia

The New England Journal of Medicine recently published a remarkable series of apologiae for conflicts of interest,(1-4) about which we have published three posts, here, here, and here.  Just to ice the cake, the NEJM also set up a reader poll on the subject. Its introduction stated,

we invite you to put yourself in the role of editor and help us decide about the suitability of three hypothetical potential authors of review articles for the Journal.

However, as noted first in a post on the HealthNewsReview.org blog, the poll had a curious design. 

Each of the three hypothetical experts has some type of financial arrangement with the pharmaceutical industry � either royalty payments, speaking fees, or commercially supported research at a university that covers everything except the researcher�s salary.

Noticeably absent was a 'Case #4' describing a potential author with no conflict of interest. 

IMHO, this seems like a biased survey design.  By failing to incorporate a questions about an unconflicted author, the numeric results of the poll could not show whether those answering it would actually favor authors without conflicts of interest.  Of course, the whole thrust of the three commentary(2-4) plus one editorial(1) NEJM series was that concerns about such conflicts are overblown.

Nonetheless, the poll allowed for comments, and as the blog post showed, this bias did not escape notice.  One commentator, Dr David Newman, wrote

The only reason to choose any of the individuals in these cases would be if there were no available alternatives.

This survey bias did not escape Dr Josh Farkas, who wrote this in a PulmCrit blog post,

Perhaps the most interesting component of the media campaign is the reader poll about the adequacy of various hypothetical authors for a review article.  Three potential authors are described, all of whom have significant COIs.  The design of this poll itself is biased, by presenting no authors without COIs.  A more transparent approach might be to simply ask readers 'do you think review article authors should be allowed to have COIs?'

Thus, the NEJM conflict of interest poll appears to be not an attempt at unbiased data collection, but a "push poll."  A "push poll," per Wikipedia, is:

an interactive marketing technique, most commonly employed during political campaigning, in which an individual or organization attempts to influence or alter the view of voters under the guise of conducting a poll.

By prominently publishing a poll with such a biased design, the NEJM has further supported my argument that its current editors are engaging in polemics rather than scholarly debate about the very important issue of conflicts of interest in medicine and health care.  Perhaps the current NEJM editors should consider joining the blogsphere in which polemics abound, while leaving the serious business of scholarly journal editing to those who are more dispassionate.   

References
1.Drazen JM.  Revisiting the commercial-academic interface.  N Eng J Med 2015; ; 372:1853-1854. Link here.
2. Rosenbaum L.  Reconnecting the dots - reinterpreting industry-physician relations.  N Eng J Med 2015; 372:1860-1864.  Link here.
3. Rosenbaum L. Understanding bias - the case for careful study.  N Engl J Med 2015;  372:1959-1963.  Link here.
4.  Rosenbaum L.  Beyond moral outrage - weighing the trade-offs of COI regulation. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 2064-2068.  Link here.
Princess Health and Almost one-third of teens have changed their health habits after looking up information on the Internet, study suggests.Princessiccia

Princess Health and Almost one-third of teens have changed their health habits after looking up information on the Internet, study suggests.Princessiccia

A decade-long study by researchers at Northwestern University about how teenagers use the Internet for health information found that almost one-third of adolescents report changing health habits after looking for information online, Lena H. Sun writes for the Washington Post.

The study also found that almost 25 percent of teens check the Internet to find information about health conditions their family and friends have. "While most teens rely on digital resources to learn more about puberty, drugs, sex and depression, among other issues, a surprising 88 percent said they did not feel comfortable sharing their health concerns with friends on Facebook or on other social networking sites," Sun writes.

"I mainly find it kind of moving because it really illustrates that a lot of teens are grappling with very real, very important health challenges and that the Internet is empowering them with the information they need to take better care of themselves," said Vicky Rideout, a co-author of the study.

Although the study found that parents are still the leading source of health information�55 percent of teens reported learning "a lot" of health information from parents�and health classes in school, doctors and nurses came in second and third, the Internet is the fourth-largest source of health information. "Eighty-four percent of teens said they turned to the Internet for health information," Sun reports.

Teens are still asking their parents health questions, and only 13 percent of those surveyed said they consult the Internet because they couldn't talk to their parents. "The Internet is not replacing parents, teachers and doctors; it is supplementing them," the researchers wrote.

Participants in the study were 1,156 American teenagers between 13 and 18 years old. "We need to make sure there is good information for teens online," Rideout said. Teenagers need to learn digital literacy skills and acquire the ability to tell the difference between advertising and content. (Read more)