Wednesday, 9 March 2016

Princess Health and Low-income workers say to keep Kynect and Medicaid expansion; advocates wonder how new insurance exchange will work. Princessiccia

By Melissa Patrick
Kentucky Health News

As Republican Gov. Matt Bevin's administration moves forward with plans to dismantle Kynect, the state's health insurance exchange, several working Kentuckians shared stories at a news conference March 8 about how having affordable health insurance through Kynect and expansion of Medicaid has changed their lives, and asked the governor to reconsider his decision.

Jesus Gonzalez and Troy May
"For working Kentuckians in particular, Kynect is much more than just a website. It is a one-stop-shop for coverage that allows workers, students and caregivers an easy and seamless way to not only enroll in coverage, but to move easily between Medicaid and private insurance as their incomes fluctuate," said Emily Beauregard, executive director of Kentucky Voices for Health, an umbrella group of health-care lobbying organizations.

Beauregard said that contrary to popular belief, most newly insured Kentuckians are low-income workers who didn't have health benefits.

One of the part-time workers from Covington, Troy May, who is also a full-time graduate student at Cincinnati Christian University, explained how getting insurance through a qualified health plan on Kynect has allowed him to pursue a new career, work part-time and also care for his 90-year-old grandmother. He said federally subsidized insurance from Kynect "fills in the gap" between his life now and when he will eventually work full time and get work benefits.

"Every time that Gov. Bevin talks about dismantling Kynect," May said, "it's like a punch in the stomach." He said the same coverage he gets on Kynect will be $200 more a month, with higher deductibles and co-payments on the federal exchange, which he says is not affordable.

"So this idea that we can easily move to a federal exchange and it not impact Kentuckians negatively is just flat out wrong," he said, adding later, "I beg Governor Bevin and the Republicans in the state not to dismantle Kynect."

May said he is a Democrat who comes from a family of Republicans, many of whom have signed up for health insurance through Kynect and have asked him, on their behalf, to ask Bevin to reverse his decision.

Another worker, Jesus Gonzalez, a single father and a food server in a Lexington restaurant, signed up on Kynect for the Medicaid expansion, which allows those with incomes up to 138 percent of the federal poverty line to enroll. He said that he had not had health insurance for the past 10 years because he couldn't afford it and shared stories about the "peace of mind" he now has because he can go to the doctor and the dentist. He said this has "made a huge difference in my life."

"It is really important that we do what we can to save and keep Kynect and Mediciad expansion in Kentucky," Gonzalez said. Bevin has said the expansion won't be sustainable once the state has to start paying a small part of the cost next year, and is negotiating changes in the program with the federal government.

The conference was sponsored by Keep Kentucky Covered, a coalition that is focused on sustaining access to affordable health coverage in Kentucky through Medicaid expansion and Kynect.

Pleas to save Kynect are likely falling on deaf ears. Bevin campaigned on closing Kynect, and has said it is redundant because there is a federal exchange that does the same things.

Advocates argue that Kynect provides one website to sign up for subsidized insurance and Medicaid, while Bevin's new model will require two websites, one called Benefind for Medicaid and other public-assistance programs, and the HealthCare.gov for federally subsidized insurance.

Health Secretary Vickie Yates Brown Glisson told a House budget subcommittee last week that the state would move to a "supported state-based marketplace" that will allow it to keep some control over review of insurance plans and handle insurance-company grievances, but the actual enrollment and any consumers' eligibility appeals will be handled by the federal exchange. Consumer grievances will be handled by a state-federal partnership.

Glisson said she didn't know how many Kynectors, or health-insurance navigators, will remain. Beauregard and Rep. Joni Jenkins, D-Louisville, chair of the House Budget Review Subcommittee on Human Services, voiced concerns about the abilities of local offices of the Department of Community Based Services to handle the 1.3 million Kentuckians on Medicaid.

"They are already overburdened and overwhelmed with the amount of work that they are doing and facing budget cuts," Beauregard said. "I worry that people are going to have a harder time getting enrolled in coverage and keeping their coverage, and getting the assistance they need when they run into an application problem or need to ask a question."

Wait times at DCBS offices average 2 hours and 44 minutes, while wait times at the Kynect call center are 2.15 minutes, according to the education and outreach director at Kynect, Beauregard said.

Jenkins voiced the same concerns in a separate interview, also noting the importance of Kynectors who not only help people sign up for health insurance, but also help them access health care after they sign up.

"I would hope that our state's goal was to not only get people signed up, but (to also) connect them with health care," Jenkins said. Later adding, "I find it so interesting that we are going to do away with a Kentucky-made product that is working so well, that pays for itself, and that was paid for by federal dollars and it's like letting big brother come down and -- so, that is very interesting,"

Glisson told the subcommittee that she believed there would be some funding for Kynectors. She also said the county-based employees of her cabinet could help people get to the federal exchange if they don't qualify for Medicaid.

But even if some Kynectors are included in this new model, the number of them will be determined by the number of people on the federally subsidized plans, and not include funding for Kynectors to help those on Medicaid, Beauregard said, "so you will also see a difference in the level of service you get if you enroll in Medicaid verses enrolling in a private plan," she said.

"What is really important right now is to ensure that we have an enrollment system that works as well or better than Kynect moving forward for all of the Medicaid recipients in Kentucky," Beauregard said. "And what that means is that we have to make sure that we have the capacity, whether that be at the Kynect call centers or in DCBS, to help these individuals enroll in coverage and to make sure that we are not creating barriers that translate into our uninsured rates going higher again or people loosing access to the care that they critically need,"
Princess Health and  March 9th, 2016 More Rest. Princessiccia

Princess Health and March 9th, 2016 More Rest. Princessiccia

March 9th, 2016 More Rest

Opting for more rest tonight. It was a good day. I maintained the integrity of my maintenance calorie budget, I remained abstinent from refined sugar and I hit my water goal. That's a good day in my book!

The Tweets taking it the rest of the way this evening.

My Tweets Today:




































Thank you for reading and your continued support,
Strength,
Sean
Princess Health and "How Employed Physicians' Contracts May Threaten Their Patients and Professionalism" Authored by Health Care Renewal Bloggers Published in Annals of Internal Medicine. Princessiccia

Princess Health and "How Employed Physicians' Contracts May Threaten Their Patients and Professionalism" Authored by Health Care Renewal Bloggers Published in Annals of Internal Medicine. Princessiccia

We have noted that increasing numbers of physicians provide patient care as employees of large organizations, often hospital systems, sometimes for-profit.  Since in these settings physicians must answer to generic management which may be more concerned with short-term revenues than patient care, these new arrangements are frought with hazards for physicians and patients.

One set of hazards may be found in the contracts employed physicians must sign.  

My fellow blogger, Dr Wally Smith, and I authored an article just published online "How Employed Physicians' Contracts May Threaten Their Patients and Professionalism." Here is the link.

In it we listed multiple contractual provisions that may be found in employed physicians contracts  that may threaten professionalism and good patient care:

 Confidentiality clauses - which may hide quality and safety problems, medical errors, unethical conduct, other problematic contract clauses, and malfeasance
Productivity clauses - which may provide incentives for actions that primarily increase employers' revenues, and thus may encourage overtreatment
"Leakage control" clauses - which may discourage referrals outside of the employers' systems and thus discourage appropriate referrals for particular patients, potentially threatening quality
Clauses that allow termination without cause - which may reduce access for the terminated physicians' patients, and may discourage complaints by physicians about quality, safety, unethical behavior, or malfeasance
Noncompete clauses - which may reduce access and physicians' ability to leave unsatisfactory positions
Clauses that restrict outside activites - which may restrict teaching or research, or academic freedom or free speech

We also noted clauses in contracts that employers may sign with third parties that may also threaten professionalism and good patient care:

"Gag" clauses affecting employees - which may hide quality and safety problems, medical errors, unethical conduct and malfeasance
"Anti-poaching" clauses - which may reduce patients' access to care, and physicians' ability to leave unsatisfactory positions.

We were able to find cases illustrating all the clauses published in the news media, or publications such as Medscape or Medical Economics.  However, they have largely anechoic in the scholarly medical and health services literature, and largely unaddressed by the medical societies that ostensbibly protect physicians' professionalism and patients' and the public's health.   

We suggested that such contractual problems may be becoming more frequent in a health care system in which physicians more often are corporate. We suggested that all physicians confronted with new employment contracts should seek competent legal connsel and try to negotiate egregious provisions.  However, such actions may now be futile given the increasing market dominance of the hospital systems that are employing increasing numbers of physicians.

We urged medical societies to inform physicians about such employment issues, and better support physicians who struggle with them.  However, these contract problems may merely be a reflection of an increasingly commercialized, deregulated health care system run by generic managers who may put revenue generation ahead of supporting physicians' professionalism.  So, better enforcement of existing laws, and new laws including bans on the commercial practice of medicine may be the only solutions to this newly recognized plight of corporate physicians and their patients.   

Tuesday, 8 March 2016

Princess Health and  March 8th, 2016 Escaping The Escape. Princessiccia

Princess Health and March 8th, 2016 Escaping The Escape. Princessiccia

March 8th, 2016 Escaping The Escape

I'll never forget it. It wasn't necessarily unlike previous experiences, but it was the first big one that came along after the turnaround from relapse/regain started. I was ready to calmly walk into the grocery store, grab a pint or more of ice cream and sneak away, while throwing it all away.

Forget the months and months of abstinence from refined sugar. Forget the weight lost in positive progress since the start of the turnaround from relapse/regain. Forget it all. And remember...

Remember the escape. Remember the enjoyment of blindly investing in false promises of comfort. Remember the taste--the sweetness, the can't get enough--remember the sensation of being taken away from whatever moments created the emotional disturbance in the first place? Would those emotions be erased? Would the situation magically correct itself? Would I feel better?

I suppose, in those moments of medication, so strongly affected, I could pretend the answers were yes. But experience told me, it's no...no, it doesn't fix anything. But maybe--just maybe, I wanted the escape anyway. But the price was too high. The exchange, a lopsided one--if only I could create the rationalizations and muster the enabling thoughts to make me feel better about willingly diving headfirst into chaos. 

Dear God, why is this so hard sometimes???? 

The situation was a familiar one. There's no need for intimate details. It was the fall of 2014 and the realization and pains of inevitable change made itself here and now. It was a gradual ascent to the moment, but still not easy to handle. It was emotional. The details aren't important. What's important to note is the lifetime pattern of dealing with emotions of all varieties and stress of any kind, in the same way; hardly at all. 

I would run the other way--quickly, and straight to my substance of choice, and the escape--the numbing of those feelings. The feelings wouldn't go away, of course--but they'd be muted or at least turned way down for a little while--or for as long as I remained in the food. 

Much like the desperate fall of 2008 realization that if something didn't change, nothing would change for the better,  I knew--I just knew, I was at a crossroads. One turn led to the ice cream isle, the other to Gerri, whose support was always ready and waiting on the other end of the phone--if, I was willing to reach out. I'm so much more experienced at turning toward the ice cream and comparatively inexperienced in turning toward support.

I almost made the same familiar choice that night. Had I done that--there's a very good chance I wouldn't be sitting here writing this post right now. And that's the hard truth. Because escaping the escape isn't easy, ever.

I usually text first and ask if it's a good time for a call. But this was an emergency. I was on the brink of a meltdown.

I warned those thoughts prior to the call... One more thought about the binge--and I'm telling on you... This inner dialogue was something I learned from Gerri. I look at it as an exercise in awareness. If I can stop long enough to have some inner dialogue--then maybe it'll be just enough time for me to make the next right move.

Gerri and I talked about how I was feeling. We discussed the situation. We discussed the alternatives. The more positive perspective she offered--the stronger I felt. By the time we ended our call, I felt empowered. I suddenly felt like I could face these feelings instead of stuff them, like so many times before. I discovered I wasn't alone.

The value of that phone call is difficult to put a number on. The choices that night quite possibly had life or death consequences. Because we don't know how long we have. We don't know how many chances we'll get along the way. I don't believe in "it's never too late," because I've personally known people who suddenly were gone and it was, too late.

This is why I give what I do the importance level it deserves; that I deserve. Because if I continued rationalizing it away at every twist and turn of life, then life itself would eventually fade away. And I so badly want to live and smile and be strong--and handle emotions and stress in positive and constructive ways--and basically, learn to live, life.

 photo Gerri20and20me_zpst4xeh5s6.jpg
I'm so grateful for this wonderful person. With Gerri Helms--summer of 2015.
---------------------------------------------------
Today was a fantastic day. A great workday--an afternoon nap that did go a little too long, a great Tuesday night teleconference support call and I even had a dinner guest at my place. Kristin came over for chicken kabobs. I had a great workout, too.

I maintained the integrity of my maintenance calorie budget, I remained abstinent from refined sugar and I exceeded my water goal.

I'll start fresh again in the morning. I hope and pray for another good day, tomorrow.

My Tweets Today:


































Thank you for reading and your continued support,
Strength,
Sean

Monday, 7 March 2016

Princess Health and March 7th, 2016 For Optimal Growth. Princessiccia

March 7th, 2016 For Optimal Growth

When I started this blog in 2008, I really didn't have a clue where it would lead. My only hope was that it would help me stay accountable and encourage me to dig a little deeper into the behaviors and issues keeping me over 500 pounds for so many years. It's certainly done this and a whole lot more. 

Just when I thought it was over and the good from it was gone, I started a new chapter--and what was revealed throughout the process really changed everything for me. 

I had a really good one on one support conversation today all about forgiving ourselves in order to move forward. For me, the constant self-loathing brutality I unleashed throughout my relapse/regain period had the potential to keep me in a down position for the rest of my life. 

I found this excerpt from exactly two years and a day ago:
  
I've noticed a major positive difference since declaring to be more self-compassionate. The guilt and shame of regain is pretty much gone. I give an incredible amount of credit to the numerous people who have come forward, sharing their own stories of regain. Feelings of shame and guilt prefer to be alone for optimal growth. And because so many have shared with me their stories and their hope, I know I'm not alone, ever.

Getting back on track has been another big factor in alleviating the brutally abusive thoughts and resulting emotions. I know where I'm headed. And it feels good to be going in a positive direction. The hopeless feelings of a downward spiral always feel that way because of the decent. When we're back up and moving in a positive direction we suddenly realize there is hope after all.

This from my facebook post in March 2014:
I've heard from several people recently who have told me they're �starting over." First, realize you're not completely starting over. Now, you're armed with new information about yourself�some you may not have considered before now. Every �failed� weight loss attempt in my life wasn't a failure, it was a teacher. With this new perspective--approach with simplicity, confidence, and joy. And know: This time will be unlike any other because the focus is heavy on YOU and the real changes you desire,�the ones you once thought impossible...they're not, they're yours for the choosing."

Michael Prager, Author of "Fat Boy, Thin Man" commented:
 "I start over every morning, regardless of how yesterday went. I only have today."

Isn't that the most wonderful perspective we can embrace? What if we let go of yesterday and fully embraced today? Now, if yesterday was awesome, then fine---but still, today is all we have. Truly, this is a one day at a time road we're traveling.
Simply click on the poster to enlarge.

Are you ready to discover the difference strong accountability and support can make with your weight loss goals?
We have spaces available in our next 10 week support group teleconference sessions starting March 21st and 22nd. If you have any questions, please contact me directly via FB message or email: transformation.road@gmail.com

To register for Monday nights click here:

To register for Tuesday nights click here:

I'm hitting the pillow after a very productive day, at work, in support and on a special project I'm working on with a collaborator. Time to rest!

My Tweets Today:






























Thank you for reading and your continued support,
Strength,
Sean

Sunday, 6 March 2016

Princess Health and  March 6th, 2016 Testing The Theory. Princessiccia

Princess Health and March 6th, 2016 Testing The Theory. Princessiccia

March 6th, 2016 Testing The Theory

I'm very grateful for so many blessings in my life. I've developed a greater sense of gratitude since I started this turnaround from relapse/regain. I'm more aware. I look at things differently than I did before.

The "epiphany day," May 15th, 2014 and then May 19th, 2014 (both easily located in the archives) describe a recipe for a nice measure of happiness, regardless of circumstances. I feel like I've been testing the "happiness code" theory every day, since those dates.

Nurturing the core elements of me--the ones I've always possessed, at 500 pounds and my healthiest weight, is a practice I plan on continuing. When these core elements get nurtured, they can blossom and when this happens, suddenly things to be grateful for show themselves more clearly.

Today was a really good day. Noah joined me for a trip to see mom and we had a blast. He's growing so quickly, developing more and more all the time. He's communicating well and speaking more, too. He doesn't fully understand that if you throw your shoe out the window of a moving car, it's probably gone, forever. He likely thought I would go get it back for him. Had I known when he did it, I likely would have turned around and searched. So, I guess he was right. Maybe that's what he was throwing a fit about. I just started singing finger family puppet songs (trust me-it's a thing) in response. He was probably thinking, hey--stop with the singing and go back for my shoe!  

We enjoyed a nice visit with mom over dinner before grabbing some milk for him and coffee for me, for the ride home.

I had a great workout tonight. I hit my other goals for today as well-- calorie budget integrity was maintained, I remained abstinent from refined sugar and I exceeded my minimum 64oz water goal. I'd say it was a complete day. I'm grateful.

My Tweets Today:






























Thank you for reading and your continued support,
Strength,
Sean

Thursday, 3 March 2016

Princess Health and Trumped Up "Nutritional" Products - A Cautionary Tale of Immediate Relevance. Princessiccia

On Health Care Renewal, we frequently discuss deceptive marketing schemes designed to sell tests and treatments whose benefits for patients do not clearly outweigh their harms, and sometimes which are useless or dangerous.  In fact, we have to be selective about discussing such cases, because they are all too common.  Therefore, we tend to focus on cases involving the biggest and most powerful health care organizations, and/or the worst risks to patients.

We have generally not discussed the myriad promotions of dubious "nutritional" tests and therapies, because there are just so many of them, the players involved are generally small, and these products were effectively deregulated in the US by the 1994 Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act.  However, last year we discussed how the marketing of a "nutritional supplement" containing an amphetamine like substance was seemingly facilitated by the revolving door at the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The Trump Network -Background

But a story recently republished by Stat is now suddenly relevant because one of the players involved is now so influential.  It recounted the rise and fall of The Trump Network, a network marketing scheme to sell nutritional products.

Actually, the most colorful version of the background of this story comes from a 2011 article in New York Magazine.  Here is how the network marketing worked, using an example centered around a Trump Network marketer-to-be named Izzo:

He would order the vitamins from a company called Ideal Health. She would earn a commission on the sale and he, in turn, would become a part of her team and encourage other people to buy the vitamins. For those sales, Izzo would earn a commission, as would she (his 'upline'), and then the people he sold the vitamins to would become part of his sales team and would go on to create their own sales teams, who would go on to create their own sales teams, etc., ad infinitum, all of them funneling commissions from their sales up to Izzo and the woman on the phone. As he listened, 'something clicked,' Izzo says. 'I saw the beauty of the business model. And I said, �How can I do this, and do this big?�?'

The idea was so big it was picked up by no other than "The Donald" Trump.

'The name is hot!� Donald Trump booms over the speakerphone from his office at 725 Fifth Avenue, where, ever since The Apprentice breathed new life into his brand, he has presided over an ever-diversifying array of businesses. He is, of course, speaking of his own name. �It�s on fire!�

In March 2009, Trump purchased Ideal Health, rebranding it the Trump Network. Though the packaging has now been imprinted with the Trump family crest, the product line is still much the same. There are the two multivitamins: Prime Essentials and the more expensive Custom Essentials, the ingredients of which are determined by the Trump Network�branded PrivaTest, a urine test that claims to determine which vitamins the user needs. There�s also a line of healthy snacks for kids called Snazzle Snaxxs, QuikStik energy drinks, and a Silhouette Solutions diet program. With the Trump investment, the company has added a skin-care line that goes by the seductively foreign name BioC� Cosmeceuticals.

Back then, Mr Trump thought the sky would be the limit.


Next year, the Trump Network plans to add more products and extend its reach to Europe and Asia. The goal, Trump says, is to eventually become bigger than Amway, now an $8.4 billion company and the giant in the field. Whether or not the people of Laos will spring for a skin-care line from a man famous for his perma-tan, some Long Islanders seem convinced.

�People have said, �This is Donald Trump�s network-marketing company? I want in,�?� says Alex, Izzo�s pretty 29-year-old daughter, who quit her job and moved back in with her parents last year in order to become a marketer, as the people in the network call themselves. �I was talking to a woman the other day and she said, �If I can�t trust Donald Trump, who can I trust?� And I said, �You�re totally right.�?�

As Stat noted, Trump helped market the network with great enthusiasm back then.


Donald Trump was ready to make some money on vitamins.

On a Friday night in November 2009, Trump stood before a crowd of thousands at the Hyatt Regency in Miami to launch a new enterprise, The Trump Network. Behind him was a gigantic image of his family crest and an enormous photograph of himself.

'We�re gonna come out with new and different products,' Trump told the crowd. 'They�re gonna be wonderful products.'

Marketing videos that include Mr Trump are still readily available online,



In the video, Mr Trump said"Americans need a new plan. They need a new dream. The Trump Network means to give millions of people a new hope."

The Problems with the Trump Network

Well, how did that work out?

The Stat article described the Network's big product:

The Trump Network asserted that it could use a urine test to recommend customized nutritional supplements, its signature products. It also offered products that purportedly tested for allergies and bone health.

In particular,

The Trump Network sold many health and wellness products, and its main one was a customized nutritional supplement whose composition was determined by a urine test, called the PrivaTest.

A former marketer provided STAT with a kit for Ideal Health�s PrivaTest. It contained a urine collection cup, five test tubes, a cold pack, a biohazard bag, a prepaid FedEx mailing label, and detailed instructions. Customers collected their urine and shipped it to a lab for analysis. That lab analyzed the urine with three tests and produced a report, which was sent to The Trump Network.

The Trump Network bundled the report with a package of pills and shipped it all back to the customer. The pills were marketed as 'Custom Essentials,' formulations based on the results of the test and manufactured by another lab. In all, there were 48 formulations.

According to an archived version of The Trump Network�s website that can still be found online, the PrivaTest, along with a month�s worth of the Custom Essentials, cost $139.95. Retesting was available for $99.95, plus shipping and handling. The company recommended retesting every nine to 12 months.

Other products purportedly tested for food allergies, stress, and digestive health. One claimed to measure 'the balance between your �good� estrogen and your �bad� estrogen.'

The problem is that there is no evidence that these products, particularly PrivaTest, worked in any sense. First, there appeared to be no publicly available data on how the tests worked, what they actually tested, or how accurate they were.  Then there was no data about how the test results could rationally be used to suggest particular mixes of vitamin supplements.  Also, there was apparently no public data about what vitamins were in the potions sent to consumers, their purity, their strength, etc.

Worse, there was no evidence that any of this provided any benefits to the people who ended up taking the vitamins.

To support the necessity of supplements, The Trump Network�s website cited a 2002 article from the Journal of the American Medical Association. The article, it said, 'stated that every adult needs to supplement their nutrition to remain healthy.'

But the article also specifically cautioned against the types of products that The Trump Network sold.  'The Internet and health food stores are filled with promotions for these special-purpose multivitamins, which are often costly,� the article said. �The only evidence-based arguments for taking more than a common multivitamin once a day pertain to the elderly and women who might become pregnant.'

The JAMA article warned against tests that claimed they can help consumers determine which vitamins they should take.

Worse,


While the FDA may not have evaluated the tests or supplements, independent scientists have � and raised many questions.

Cohen, one of several scientists who reviewed materials from Ideal Health and The Trump Network, said that the tests were marketed too broadly and seemed to be 'pathologizing normal human life.'

The website, for example, recommended its �AllerTest� to anyone who had dark circles under their eyes, occasional digestive problems, fluctuating blood sugar, sinus and respiratory problems, or tiredness after eating.

'Does your blood sugar fluctuate?' Cohen said, laughing. 'If your blood sugar does not fluctuate, you are extremely ill. You will not be long on this planet.'

What�s more, the AllerTest did not measure food allergies, as the network�s website claimed it would, according to outside analysis of materials from the testing lab and Ideal Health publications.

The test measured information about an antibody known as immunoglobulin G, or IgG, according to company publications. The antibody is normally produced in the body and not indicative of a food allergy, said Dr. Robert Wood, director of pediatric allergy and immunology at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine.

'There�s no disease condition for which the IgG antibodies have any relevance at all,' Wood said.
So while Mr Trump, his company, and some of his marketers might have made money from the Trump Network, there is no evidence that its products actually provided any health benefits.

Also, in the long run, Mr Trump's grandiose claims about how the riches his new marketers would receive also proved wanting.  Despite Trump's initial enthusiasm, the Trump Network hardly went global,


Regardless of the science, Trump�s name did wonders for Ideal Health in the short term. Former marketers said the company grew significantly in the months following the name change.

Then, the network began experiencing financial difficulties.

'The Trump Network had gotten in trouble financially,' said Bonnie Futrell, a former marketer and 'diamond director' � one of the top-tier marketers in the company. 'They weren�t being able to pay [the lab]. They weren�t paying vendors. They weren�t paying us.'

Futrell said she was involved in discussions with company higher-ups about how to salvage the organization.

On Dec. 31, 2011, the license agreement expired, said Garten, the general counsel for The Trump Organization. It was not renewed.

Note that this story was also summarized in an AP article available via CBS.   The Network's products were also reviewed, not favorably, on QuackWatch.

Summary

The Trump Network sold nutritional testing and products any clear evidence that they provided any benefits to patients, or that they worked at all in any sense.  Some of the products, like the allergy test discussed above, did not appear to be what they were advertised to be.  Since the Network's products and the outcomes of people using them apparently never were the subject of any clinical research, whether the products did any harm is unknown.  Thus, the Network was like many other dodgy efforts to sell totally unproven "nutritional" products.  Its main results seem to have been transferring money from the pockets of the gullible to the marketers, and to Mr Trump himself.  While Mr Trump recruited marketers with boastful assertions of giving people "new hope," that hope was false.

The increasing commercialization of health care, enabled by deregulation justified by market fundamentalism,  now means that health care has become increasingly a means of transferring money from the little people to big corporations, in this example, those corporations owned by Mr Trump, without providing any net health benefit to those whose pockets have been invaded.  This is bad enough.

But at the moment, Mr Trump is considered the front runner for the Republican presidential nomination, although he is attracting more enmity, much of it from the Republican party. It is ironic that Mr Trump seems to be winning support from a lot of "little people" whom he has promised to defend.  Yet it was the little people who marketed the Trump Network and bought its products who were eventually left hanging. 

The Stat article mentioned that some minor candidates for the Republican nomination this year were also tarred with stories about their involvement in questionable health marketing schemes.  And previous major party candidates have certainly had some health care conflicts of interest.  In fact, we discussed that the current First Lady once was a top executive of a big hospital chain, and the last Republican presidential candidate was a leader of a private equity firm that owned numerous health companies.   It may be unprecedented, at least in recent history, for someone who had been directly involved in the shady marketing of dubious health remedies to be a genuine contender for the US presidency.

There are many bigger issues in the current election than health care.  But now we are faced with Mr Trump, who once hawked unsubstantiated health benefits of dodgy nutritional products, and recruited marketers for these products with false promises of wealth to come.  And Mr Trump has some real possibility of  becoming the President of the US, to whom the Department of Health and Human Services, and the Department of Veterans Affairs report.  What damage could such a leader do to health care?  And what other damage could a man who so cavalierly fleeced the little people with his dubious nutritional product marketing scheme  do, especially to the little people who now so unconditionally support him?

Is there a better example showing why we as a society need to completely rethink who gets to become our leaders?  My only hope is we can do that rethinking in time to prevent a disaster.