Home / All Post

Thursday, 9 June 2016

Princess Health and Salmonella outbreak in 35 states linked to live poultry; 21 cases reported in Kentucky; here are some tips to avoid infection . Princessiccia

Add Comment
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention photo
Poultry specialists from the University of Kentucky are urging Kentuckians who raise chickens or ducks to take extra precautions against salmonella infection, since 21 cases have been reported in the state.

�Any contact with live poultry puts you at risk for salmonella infection,� Jacqueline Jacob, UK poultry extension project manager for the College of Agriculture, Food and Environment, said in a news release. �Salmonella germs can be in the birds� droppings and on their bodies and also on their cages, coops, hay, plants and the soil where they live and roam.�

Salmonella is a bacteria that makes people sick. Symptoms usually develop 12 to 72 hours after exposure and include diarrhea, fever and abdominal cramps. The illness usually lasts four to seven days. Children under 5, adults older than 65 and those with weakened immune systems are at the greatest risk of being severely affected.

These infections are part of a seven-state salmonella outbreak that have all been linked to contact with life poultry from multiple hatcheries. Jacob cautioned that any chicken can carry salmonella, even if it looks clean and healthy.

So far, more than 300 people have been infected, with more than one-fourth of those children aged 5 or younger, according to the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

�Many of the cases in the current outbreak are linked to backyard flocks, so we want to remind folks of simple things they can do to protect themselves," Jacob said.

Tips to avoid infection:
  • Wash hands thoroughly with soap and water immediately after touching live poultry or anything in the area where they live.
  • Do not let live poultry inside the house, or around areas where food or drink is located.
  • Do not let children younger than 5 handle or touch live poultry without supervision.
  • Adults should supervise the handwashing of young children.
  • Keep poultry away from your nose, mouth and eyes.
  • Wash your hands with sanitizer that has a 99 percent or higher bacteria kill rate after handling poultry at shows and fairs.
�It�s also a good practice to be careful when you wash equipment or eggs in the kitchen sink,� Jacob said. �You don�t want to cross contaminate food. Always use a good disinfectant to clean up in the kitchen when you�re finished.�

Click here for more advice from the CDC for backyard flock owners.

Wednesday, 8 June 2016

Princess Health and June 8th, 2016 Big Weigh-In. Princessiccia

Princess Health and June 8th, 2016 Big Weigh-In. Princessiccia

Add Comment
June 8th, 2016 Big Weigh-In

I'm doing an "almost Tweets only" tonight. It was weigh day.
photo 203.8 weigh day_zpsf6lzm8jf.jpg
Monthly Maintenance Weigh-In: 3.2 pound loss since May 4th's weigh-in. 203.8 represents an all-time adult low (actually since 10 years old). It brings my overall weight loss to 301.2 pounds- having lost 59.6% of my previous 505 pounds. ?#?blessed? & ?#?grateful?

I wasn't able to post my blog late afternoon. And I completely obliterated my planned bedtime. I'm not going to dwell on this at all. At least not tonight. I worked this evening, a little later than I planned. Had a late dinner, too. Long day. I'm looking forward to a break from this schedule. I'll be taking one very soon.

I maintained the integrity of my calorie budget. I remained abstinent from refined sugar and I exceeded my water budget by thirty-two ounces.

I'll write more tomorrow about this weigh-in. I certainly wasn't expecting a 3.2 pound loss. I feel really well.

Continuous Live-Tweet Stream:






































Thank you for reading and your continued support,
Strength,
Sean

Princess Health and Official praises needle exchanges and medication-assisted treatment for addiction: 'Treatment works. Recovery is possible.' . Princessiccia

Add Comment
Scott Hesseltine
Scott Hesseltine, the new vice-president of addiction services at Louisville's Seven Counties Services, talked on Kentucky Educational Television about needle exchanges and a new model of addiction treatment that combines medication assisted treatment with an abstinence-based model of care.

"We are in the midst of a tragic public-health crisis and it's claiming the lives of our citizens at astronomical rates," he said, noting that more than 1,000 people die from drug overdoses in Kentucky each year and that the state has the highest rate of hepatitis C in the nation.

Seven Counties Services provides behavioral-health services, primarily for people on Medicaid, in Jefferson County and six neighboring counties: Henry, Oldham, Trimble, Spencer, Shelby and Bullitt.

The interview on "Connections with Renee Shaw" was part of KET's "Inside Opioid Addiction" initiative, which is funded in part by a grant from the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky. It aired in June.

Hesseltine, who came to Seven Counties Services from the Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation, a nationally recognized drug and alcohol treatment center, commended Kentucky's "forward thinking" in passing an anti-heroin bill last year.

Among other things, the bill allows needle exchanges to decrease the spread of infectious diseases, like hepatitis C and HIV, that are commonly spread by drug users sharing needles. They require both local approval and funding and have met with some resistance because many think they condone or perpetuate drug use.

Asked about that, Hesseltine said research shows that needle exchanges do what they are meant to do -- reduce the incidence of infectious disease among intravenous drug users.

He noted that Justice Secretary John Tilley, who was instrumental in passing the heroin bill as a state representative, said at a recent community forum in Corbin that research found that addicts who are involved in needle exchange programs are five times more likely to enter treatment.

"And we know treatment works and recovery is possible, so any avenue to slow the spread of disease and to help more people find the solution in recovery is a positive thing," he said.

Another point of contention among some lawmakers is that some of the state's needle-exchange programs don't adhere to a needle-for-needle exchange, which they say was the intent of the law,but instead provide as many needles as the addict needs for a week.

Hesseltine said the needs-based model decreases needle sharing and thus disease, so "Needs-based is more appropriate; it is more evidence based."

Hesseltine told Shaw that while working at Hazelden, he was part of an initiative that completely "altered the way we provided care." The new program, called COR-12, combines medication-assisted treatment with the 12-step abstinence model, which had been the only accepted recovery treatment program at Hazelden.

Hesseltine brought the new model with him to Seven Counties Services and said he likes to call it "medicated assisted recovery." He said "It has to be done appropriately so we are helping to stabilize someone from their biological symptoms of addiction so they can then engage in the recovery process."

Hesseltine told Shaw that addiction isn't curable, but is treatable.

"I would say it is a chronic disease that can be put into remission with structure, support, accountability and behavioral interventions," he said. "Curable? No, but like diabetes -- not curable, but certainly manageable."

Shaw asked if any addict is beyond reach. "Only someone who is not alive," Hesseltine replied. "Treatment works. Recovery is possible." He said that is why access to naloxone, the overdose-reversal drug branded as Narcan, is so important.

Asked what policy changes he would like to see, Hesseltine listed increased funding for drug treatment, "high level" models of care that shift addiction services to local communities, and repeal of the Medicaid rule that doesn't allow any reimbursement for mental-health and substance-use-disorder residential treatment facilities with more than 16 beds.

With treatment, Hesseltine said, "People can go from a pitiful and incomprehensible demoralization, a state where they have no hope to one of having hope, to being a productive member of society and to really regaining a place where they feel good about themselves and they are leading a life full of joy and freedom."
Princess Health and Transparency International Reports on Massive Corruption in the Pharmaceutical Sector - Media Hardly Notices. Princessiccia

Princess Health and Transparency International Reports on Massive Corruption in the Pharmaceutical Sector - Media Hardly Notices. Princessiccia

Add Comment
Health Care Corruption as a Taboo Topic

Transparency International (TI) defines corruption as

Abuse of entrusted power for private gain

In 2006, TI published a report on health care corruption, which asserted that corruption is widespread throughout the world, serious, and causes severe harm to patients and society.

the scale of corruption is vast in both rich and poor countries.

Also,

Corruption might mean the difference between life and death for those in need of urgent care. It is invariably the poor in society who are affected most by corruption because they often cannot afford bribes or private health care. But corruption in the richest parts of the world also has its costs.

The report did not get much attention.  Since then, health care corruption has been nearly a taboo topic in the US.  When health care corruption is discussed in English speaking developed countries, it is almost always in terms of a problem that affects benighted less developed countries.  On Health Care Renewal, we have repeatedly asserted that health care corruption is a big problem in all countries, including the US, but the topic remains anechoic.

Yet somehow, a substantial minority of US citizens, 43%, seemed to believe that corruption is an important problem in US health care, according to a TI survey published in 2013 (look here).  But that survey was largely ignored in the media and health care and medical scholarly literature in the developed world, and when it was discussed, it was again in terms of results in less developed countries.  Health Care Renewal was practically the only source of coverage in the US of the survey's results.

Transparency International's New Report on Corruption in the Pharmaceutical Sector

Now Transparency International (TI) has tried, and Health Care Reenewal will try again.  In June, 2016 Transparency International published a new report entittled

Corruption in the Pharmaceutical Sector

The report's executive summary states:

Within the health sector, pharmaceuticals stands out as sub-sector that is particularly prone to corruption. There are abundant examples globally that display how corruption in the pharmaceutical sector endangers positive health outcomes.

In my humble opinion, the report is particularly significant in that it classifies as corrupt various kinds of activities that occur within the pharmaceutical sector (and also in other parts of health care) which are often discussed publicly as anything from standard operating procedure through unfortunate errors to unethical behavior. These include many activities which we have frequently discussed on Health Care Renewal. For example,

Manipulation of Clinical Research

We have frequently discussed how pharmaceutical companies, and biotechnology, medical device, and other health care companies and organizations, may manipulate clinical research to enhance the likelihood that is results will favor their products and marketing goals, even if the results are biased, inaccurate, could mislead physicians and patients, and ultimately harm patients.  The TI report included: 

As pharmaceutical companies rely on gaining market entry in order to recoup R&D costs, when there is a lack of oversight in clinical trial data publication a conflict of interest exists in which a pharmaceutical company may have an incentive to manipulate clinical trial data. When clinical trial data is manipulated medical literature can become biased with positive findings fabricated, positive findings exaggerated or negative results hidden. This can result in inadequate prescribing patterns because HCPs rely on clinical trial data to make decisions on which medicines to use to treat patients.

Suppression of Clinical Research

We have frequently discussed how health care organizations (as above) may outright suppress clinical research when the results fail to support their interests.  The TI report included:

Transparency and access to information through mandatory clinical trial registration, sanctions for not registering results or providing clinical trial information, and the publication of both positive and negative results are commonly discussed as helpful tools to curb corruption. With the European Medicines Agency (EMA) as a notable positive exception, public agencies and authorities do not require R&D-based pharmaceutical companies to make their raw data publicly available, making it impossible to verify whether the reported results are accurate. Based on laws and regulations clinical trial data is considered to be proprietary information, which allows pharmaceutical companies to conceal important data from the public domain.

Manipulation of the Dissemination of Clinical Research

We have frequently discussed how health care organizations may manipulate the dissemination of clinical research, through various forms of publications, presentations, courses, media summaries, etc, to favor their products and marketing goals, even if the results are misleading and could harm patients.  For example, a while back we discussed the problem of "ghost-written" articles appearing in scholarly journals. The TI report included:

The practice of ghostwriting is also a risk with clinical trials. Ghostwriting involves the writing of clinical trial publications by industry and then having a highly esteemed researcher pass these findings off as their own without disclosing their actual involvement with the authorship of the article. It is a common practice, particularly in industry led trials. Ghostwriting is done to increase the prestige and reputation of the findings, while simultaneously researchers are able to improve their reputation, which can lead to promotions. Clearly this practice can result in inaccurate results being published.

Deceptive Marketing

We have frequently discussed how marketing of pharmaceuticals (and nearly everything else in health care) may be deceptive, favoring companies' products and services, but again misleading health care professionals and patients, and ultimately risking patient harm.  In the extreme, pharmaceutical companies (and other health care organizations) may resort to bribes or kickbacks.  The TI report included:

There are several methods for a corrupt pharmaceutical company to unethically market its medicines. At its most simple a pharmaceutical company can bribe a HCP directly with payments so its medicines are more likely to be prescribed. More abstrusely individuals may include a pharmaceutical company�s medicine on the national list that is reimbursed by public funds, in return for an indirect bribe by being sent to inappropriate holiday destinations for lavish conferences.

Corrupt marketing practices also include pharmaceutical companies providing misleading information regarding the safety and efficacy of a medicine to influence doctors� prescribing habits and encouraging off-label, unlicensed use to increase sales.

Other Topics

Finally, the report mentions such issues as the revolving door, regulatory capture, etc, etc, etc

A Striking, and Strikingly Anechoic Report

Again, while the report summarizes information that is likely familiar to most Health Care Renewal readers, what is striking is that it describes manipulation of clinical research, suppression of clinical research, manipulation of dissemination of clinical research, and deceptive marketing as corruption.  That is a sentiment rarely heard in the US, and one that appears nearly taboo.  

Demonstrating the strength of the taboo, this striking report has gotten almost no attention in the media or scholarly medical and health care literature in the developed English-speaking countries.  Let me note the important exceptions, however.

I learned of the report from a brief news item from the BMJ, the prestigious UK journal that seems most at the forefront of championing the integrity of medical and health care research.(1)  The only substantial news article I could find on the report was also from the UK, in the Independent.  Its sub-title is worth repeating:

Transparency International says corruption is making a few rich and wrecking the health of some of the world's poorest people

Also, there were brief articles in Reuters, and in (web-only) FiercePharma.  That is about it so far.

The report itself suggests why it has been so anechoic, just like nearly every other attempt to expose health care corruption to public discussion.  Essentially, there is so much money to be made through pharmaceutical (and by implication, other health care corruption) that the corrupt have the money, power, and resources to protect their wealth accumulation by keeping it obscure.  In the TI Report itself,

However, strong control over key processes combined with huge resources and big profits to be made make the pharmaceutical industry particularly vulnerable to corruption. Pharmaceutical companies have the opportunity to use their influence and resources to exploit weak governance structures and divert policy and institutions away from public health objectives and towards their own profit maximising interests.

Keep in mind that the money made from corruption does not just go to innocent peoples' retirement funds that are invested in pharmaceutical stocks.  It predominantly goes to top corporate executives and managers, and their cronies who preside over the corrupt practices.


I might as well repeat myself once again.  As I wrote in 2015,

If we are not willing to even talk about health care corruption, how will we ever challenge it? 

So to repeat an ending to one of my previous posts on health care corruption....  if we really want to reform health care, in the little time we may have before our health care bubble bursts, we will need to take strong action against health care corruption.  Such action will really disturb the insiders within large health care organizations who have gotten rich from their organizations' misbehavior, and thus taking such action will require some courage.  Yet such action cannot begin until we acknowledge and freely discuss the problem.  The first step against health care corruption is to be able to say or write the words, health care corruption.

Reference

1.  Torjesen I.  Group calls for more to be done to tackle corruption in the pharmaceutical industry. BMJ 2016;353:i3099. Link here.

Tuesday, 7 June 2016

Princess Health and Kentuckians agree regionally on tobacco controls; poll shows wide differences among regions in impact of drug abuse. Princessiccia

Princess Health and Kentuckians agree regionally on tobacco controls; poll shows wide differences among regions in impact of drug abuse. Princessiccia

Add Comment
By Al Cross
Kentucky Health News

In a state that once had more tobacco farms than any other, Kentuckians in all regions of the state support policies that discourage use of the product, according to the Kentucky Health Issues Poll.

"Such policies could greatly improve Kentucky's overall health," says the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky, which co-sponsors the poll each fall. It issued a package of reports that broke down a wife range of previously reported poll results on a regional basis.

Kentucky has fewer than 5,000 tobacco farms, down from a high of 60,000 in 1982, but still has one of the nation's highest smoking rates, 26 percent. That leads to an estimated $2 billion in annual health-care costs.

In every region of the state, a majority (ranging from 59 to 70 percent) of people polled said it would be "difficult" or "very difficult" to make the most important change in their personal health behavior, which for most smokers would be to stop smoking.

"Kentucky adults in every region recognize that improving diet, getting more exercise and quitting smoking could help improve personal health, but the changes are difficult," said Susan Zepeda, president and CEO of the foundation. "Policies around these areas could help all Kentuckians improve their personal health."

The policy getting the strongest support in the poll was tobacco-free school campuses, favored by 85 percent statewide. Fewer than a third of Kentucky's school districts have such policies, but enough do to cover almost half the population.

A statewide ban on smoking in workplaces got 66 percent support. Such a ban is unlikely during the administration of Gov. Matt Bevin, who says the issue should be decided locally. About a third of the state's population lives in jurisdictions with comprehensive smoke-free ordinances; another 10 percent or so live in places that have ordinances with varying exceptions.

There was little difference among the five regions in polling on the two issues.

The poll found regional differences in the percentage of Kentucky adults who said they had no insurance, from 18 percent in Western Kentucky to 8 percent in Eastern Kentucky. The statewide uninsured rate reported at the time of the poll was 13 percent. Other surveys have showed the number in the single digits statewide, after expansion of the Medicaid program under federal health reform.

Health reform also provided subsidies for buying insurance, but some consumers have complained about high deductibles and co-payments. In Northern Kentucky, 34 percent of poll respondents said they had difficulties paying their medical bills in the previous 12 months. The figure was 31 percent in Appalachian Kentucky, 30 percent in Greater Louisville, 25 percent in Western Kentucky, and 22 percent in Greater Lexington.

"An increasing number of Kentuckians have health insurance, but many are still delaying or simply can't afford necessary health care," Zepeda said.

Federal health reform was most popular in the Louisville area, at 44 percent support, and least popular in Northern Kentucky, with 33 percent. Generally, the more impact people said reform had on them, the more likely they were to support it. Three of five Northern Kentuckians said they had not been affected by the reforms but only 45 percent in the Louisville area said that.

There are bigger differences in the impact of drug abuse. One-third of Eastern Kentucky residents in the poll reported reported family members or friends struggling with prescription drug abuse, but only 16 percent in Western Kentucky said so.

Heroin use has caused problems for 35 percent of respondents' families and friends in Northern Kentucky, 17 percent in Greater Louisville, 14 percent in Greater Lexington, 10 percent in Eastern Kentucky, and 8 percent in Western Kentucky.

The regional reports for Eastern Kentucky, Greater Lexington, Greater Louisville, Northern Kentucky, and Western Kentucky, and associated news releases, are available at http://healthy-ky.org/news-events/press-releases.

The poll was conducted Sept. 17 through Oct. 7 by the Institute for Policy Research at the University of Cincinnati. A random sample of 1,608 adults from throughout Kentucky was interviewed by landlines and cell phones. The statewide poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.4 percentage points, but the smaller regional samples have higher error margins. The complete data file, codebook and survey instrument will be posted by June 30 at http://www.oasisdataarchive.org/ with other data files from previous polls.
Princess Health and June 7th, 2016 When I Make These Things Important. Princessiccia

Princess Health and June 7th, 2016 When I Make These Things Important. Princessiccia

Add Comment
June 7th, 2016 When I Make These Things Important

My goal of late afternoon posting of this blog is proving difficult in the consistency department. This is simply a busy time in the broadcasting business! I'm identifying ways to find a better balance, I'm confident I can continue making improvements to my daily practices in order to better manage things. It's a work in progress.

I mentioned earlier this week about how a set bedtime is very difficult for me to maintain. It isn't like my calorie budget or my abstinence from refined sugar. My bedtime is affected by many different variables. These variables require me to make adjustments on a day to day basis in order to accommodate the flow. An example will come Thursday through Saturday when I'm scheduled to broadcast from the big PRCA rodeo every night from 6 to 8pm. Can I still drop in bed at a reasonable hour on those days? Yes. But only if I make adjustments earlier.

I'm very grateful each and every day. I'm grateful that my focus is in fine tuning my approach and focusing on improving areas long overdue for attention.

To be in this maintenance groove is such an amazing blessing. It takes an acceptance and embrace of my fundamental elements each and every day--and in this approach, one day at a time, I find so much peace and clarity--balance, that's what it is--a level foundation enabling me to identify other areas in need of tweaking. Like, the sleep! 

Tomorrow morning is my monthly maintenance weigh-in. I'll make my way to the doctor's office shortly after I get off the air. I've missed so many workouts lately, I'm not sure what I'll discover on that scale. But it's okay, regardless. 

And it is okay, because I'm maintaining the integrity of my calorie budget, I'm remaining abstinent from refined sugar, I'm hitting and most days exceeding my water goal, I'm in daily contact with support connections and every morning I do my #morningdeal strength exercise routine before I allow coffee. When I make these things important each day, things seem to go very well.

Continuous Live-Tweet Stream:








































Thank you for reading and your continued support,
Strength,
Sean
Princess Health and CDC boss Tom Frieden, at SOAR, gives examples of how communities can improve health, such as smoking bans. Princessiccia

Princess Health and CDC boss Tom Frieden, at SOAR, gives examples of how communities can improve health, such as smoking bans. Princessiccia

Add Comment
By Al Cross
Kentucky Health News

PIKEVILLE, Ky. -- Speaking to a region with some of the nation's poorest health, the top federal public-health official gave examples of how individual communities and states have made themselves healthier.

"Health is not just about health, it's about society," Dr. Thomas Frieden, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, told more than 1,000 people at the Shaping Our Applalachian Region Innovation Summit in Pikeville. "Healthy societies are more productive, and productive societies are more healthy."

Referring to Kentucky's high rates of disease and factors that cause them, Frieden said bringing Eastern Kentucky's health statistics up to the national average would save more than 1,000 lives a year.

Frieden cited six communities that have tackled specific health issues, such as obesity, lack of physical activity, heart health, smoking and teen pregnancy.

Obesity is one of SOAR's three main health targets, but it's not an easy one, Frieden said. He said Somerville, Mass., reduced obesity in children under 6 by 21 percent by making it a community issue, with creation of farmers' markets for local produce, construction of walking paths and the mayor leading community walks.

"Physical activity is the closest thing to a wonder drug," Frieden said, because it helps prevent heart disease, strokes, diabetes and cancer, improved mood and lengthens life.

The leading preventable cause of death is smoking, Frieden said, calling for ordinances and laws making workplaces smoke-free. "Nobody should have to risk getting cancer to come to their job," he said.

Heart disease is the most preventable major cause of death, Frieden said, explaining how Minnesota and Grace Community Health Centers in Knox, Clay, Leslie and Bell counties have improved heart health by improving treatment of high blood pressure, or hypertension. "It's the single most important thing" to do for heart health, and it's simple, Frieden said, because the medicine is inexpensive and taken once a day with few if any side effects.

Frieden said the CDC thinks a lot about teen pregnancy because "Teen pregnancy perpetuates a cycle of poverty." He said Spartanburg, S.C., reduced teen pregnancy by 61 percent from 2001 to 2014 partly because South Carolina's Medicaid program paid for long-acting, reversible contraception immediately after delivery, and was the first state to give full reimbursement for post-partum insertion of intrauterine devices for birth control. Kentucky Medicaid doesn't cover such services.


Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)